Is anyone familiar with bomb PLO variant where all the players put a mandatory 5BB PF with no more betting PF? (For a full table of 9 all the players see the flop with 45 BB in the middle).
In our game we deal a bomb hand only when all the players agree. Otherwise, the hand is dealt normally with SB, BB, bets PF, etc.
I personally don’t like this variant and often refuse it, considering it deviates too much from real poker: there is no hand

PLO 5/10, Live cash game, 8 handed, buy in 500, rake 2%. Hero (500) posts the straddle 20,
3 fold, CO (300) raises to 40, Villain (500) on the BTN calls, he is a regular, tight professional; SB and BB fold, Hero Js7h5s5h completes to 40; 3 see the flop (135) which is 7d4h3c. All check.
The turn is Jd, Hero bets 100, CO folds, Villain calls. The pot is 335
The river is Qh, Hero checks, Villain bets 200, Hero? Any comment on how Hero played his

PLO 5/10, Live cash game, 8 handed, buy in 500, rake 2%.
Cutoff Villain: loose aggressive (650)
BTN hero (seen as very tight) Q♦Q♣7♥7♠ (1000)
4 folds, Villain opens 35, Hero calls, SB and BB fold
Flop HU (85): K♥ Q♥J♠, Villain bets 50, hero raises to 200, UTG calls,
Turn (485) 3♦, Hero surprisingly bets all in (415). Hero?
What about Hero’s raise on the flop?