ex-President Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at low-info Boomers like my religions aunts. I have two questions:
a) Is anyone here who supports Trump bothered by lies like this?
b) Does anyone know what he's even talking about here? Like is there some grain of truth that he's embellishing on bigly?
In most other first world countries the underclass are immigrants (exceptions are south Korea and Japan that have basically no immigration).
Dunno why you think the social safety net is non existent in the USA, just for Medicaid they spend more than most countries spend for all public healthcare as a % of GDP.
There’s a really great episode of attorney woo that deals with prejudice against defectors(immigrants) from North Korea in South Korea.
BJ, you seem to have accidentally missed all the posts critiquing the study you posted. I know a man who assigns the highest importance to intellectual rigour, as you do, would not have ignored them on purpose. Would you like me to quote them for you, to make it easier for you to respond?
You can do whatever you like dude. If I thought posts were worth responding to I responded. If not I didn't.
However today is a new day. New day, new topic.
Riddle me this Batman. Was the Trump campaign in power and in control of the govt in 2016?
I mean, if he spied on him after the 2020 election when Trump was secretly still in power like you chuckleheads believe,
maybe.
It was after the 2016 election. Yes.
They were spying on a lawfully elected administration.
Lol Biden cult. I don't give two wet squirts about Joe Biden. Jfc. I'm not even American.
As I have repeatedly demonstrated to you, there is no evidence that Joe Biden broke the law which requires *knowingly* taking classified documents *with the intent of willfully retaining them.* Even if what is in the recent report is correct, it still does not fulfill the requirements of the proper us code which you refuse to cite (presumably because yo
Are you sure about the second quote between **? (Not rethoric, but I am not sure personally that's the law for classified documents in the USA)
You can do whatever you like dude. If I thought posts were worth responding to I responded. If not I didn't.
However today is a new day. New day, new topic.
Good strategy. Once your "study" was ripped to shreds, it indeed wasn't worth responding to any more.
Washoe could learn something from this. To be clear, I don't think he's capable of doing so, but if he was...
There’s a really great episode of attorney woo that deals with prejudice against defectors(immigrants) from North Korea in South Korea.
It's like 50 people and the fear is that they are spies, that's very different from everything else that happens wrt immigration in other countries.
They don't impact any national statistic
You will have to change your avatar (that you stole off me) dude, if you want me to respond to your posts. It's too confusing otherwise. It looks like I am responding to myself.
If I didn't hate that picture as much as I do I would use it as well just to mess with you because it's funny 🤣.
Man you are on an internet forum you have to accept some trolling
Good strategy. Once your "study" was ripped to shreds, it indeed wasn't worth responding to any more.
Washoe could learn something from this. To be clear, I don't think he's capable of doing so, but if he was...
It would be Christmas miracle! Still you would expect the story of the century about one’s favorite political criminal would survive more than one day of interest. I guess it’s just so bad….
Lol Biden cult. I don't give two wet squirts about Joe Biden. Jfc. I'm not even American.
As I have repeatedly demonstrated to you, there is no evidence that Joe Biden broke the law which requires *knowingly* taking classified documents *with the intent of willfully retaining them.* Even if what is in the recent report is correct, it still does not fulfill the requirements of the proper us code which you refuse to cite (presumably because yo
The report clearly states that Joe Biden willfully and Knowingly took classified documents and as well shared them with his ghost writer .
Are you questioning the validity of the report?
That must be an interesting job! Did you get his autograph when you took his picture?
It's cool that they let you retain the rights when you take mugshot photos.
I'll have you know I've got special rights to that mugshot granted to me by the Trump legal defence fund. It's only available to financial contributors.
The report clearly states that Joe Biden willfully and Knowingly took classified documents and as well shared them with his ghost writer .
Are you questioning the validity of the report?
The report *claims* that. Do you really not see the difference? I'm talking about what can be demonstrated. You know, with evidence. Not what can be claimed.
And you still, no matter how many times I point it out, keep skipping over the most important part.
WITH INTENT TO RETAIN
Biden returning them immediately demonstrated a LACK OF INTENT TO RETAIN.
Trump lying and hiding them and claiming they are his to keep demonstrates the INTENT TO RETAIN.
jfc it's like talking to an infant.
When you bend the rules and use the law as a weapon against political opponents (he was guilty of the charges, but so is everyone in his business and the idea was the state didn't persecute those kind of things), you need to reassure other people otherwise you don't have enough tax revenue to keep doing the sh it you like to do with other people money
The report *claims* that. Do you really not see the difference? I'm talking about what can be demonstrated. You know, with evidence. Not what can be claimed.
And you still, no matter how many times I point it out, keep skipping over the most important part.
WITH INTENT TO RETAIN
Biden returning them immediately demonstrated a LACK OF INTENT TO RETAIN.
Trump lying and hiding them and claiming they are his to keep demonstrates the INTENT TO RETA
Returning them immediately? He kept them for years. lol
When you bend the rules and use the law as a weapon against political opponents (he was guilty of the charges, but so is everyone in his business and the idea was the state didn't persecute those kind of things), you need to reassure other people otherwise you don't have enough tax revenue to keep doing the sh it you like to do with other people money
Which of Trump's NY prosecutors are his political opponents?
