The costs of trans visibility

This is exactly right. The whole woke agenda now is that the moment a kid says for the first time he or she “feels” they are the other gender they act like we have to start giving them life-altering drugs immediately. There is no time to waste. They never stop and check in with the kid to make sure the kid even knows what that means let alone figure out if that’s what the precious child really wants.

But they were both diagnosed with schizophrenia because at least at one point, they did have symptoms which were impairing to them. Trans people don't have to ever experience periods of impairment. Because again, being trans isn't a mental illness.

Did you think that having a mental illness means you are forever impaired? Because if not, why is it relevant to point out that people with mental illnesses can have productive periods in their lives?

They do -- they're at higher risk of depression. But old white men also commit suicide at higher than average rates -- is being an old white man a mental illness? Gay people die by suicide at an increased rate -- is being gay a mental illness? Clearly your argument that "given X is associated with a higher rate of suicide, therefore X is a mental illness," just doesn't hold up.

I don't think it would be the same thing as conversion therapy for homosexuality (although I believe that did "work" some of the time). But that was the more drastic choice (as opposed to doing nothing). For trans people, psychiatric measures are the less drastic choice.
If a gay man had the options of conversion therapy or castration, I would definitely recommend he try the conversion therapy first, even if it were a long shot to work.

That's good that (if?) doctors are evaluating them first, but at the least they should also be evaluated by a psychiatrist, not just an MD.

Well, we have the words that we have that mean what they mean.

You can use whatever words you like, but you don't get to include any of the connotations of the replaced words when using your new terminology.

In this case you would be trying to change a major sense of self trait (trait being different than state) to the opposite. Removing the hypothalamus and part of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex might work (not sure), but would have some major side effects. It wouldn't be a particularly popular treatment option. Most people consider their sense of self to be precious.

Happy pills are ok, as is talk therapy to develop coping skills. Might work for some people. Doesn't seem remotely like it fixes the underlying problem. Kind of like giving Ozempic to starving people to make them feel less hungry.

As an aside, it is all fairly complex since people's personalities aren't standardized. What might be best for one person might not be for the next. The person under the advice of med/psych professionals are really the only ones qualified to make the decision on what is best for the person. For some, talking therapy might be perfectly acceptable. For others, reassignment surgery. For others, something in between. It seems fairly rude and unwise to have a strong opinion on what they (as a group of individuals) should all do.

Pretty much. It’s amazing that the mods let the gimmick account have free rein in these threads. On an other hand, I guess if not for them then this site would be a ghost town so ymmv.

Well, obviously I disagree with this, at least partially because I have no such "sense of self", and I have not had a partial lobotomy.

I agree with you that it should be decided by the individual, under the advice of medical and psychiatric professionals. With the caveat that our society doesn't generally give minors the power to make any major life or health decisions, so nothing medical should be done until the individual is of the age of consent.

I do not have a strong opinion about whether or not any particular individual should or should not have reassignment surgery, or any other medical treatments. I do feel strongly that the less drastic/permanent measures should be tried first, and the least drastic measure is psychiatric treatment.

I'm rethinking it. Generally rigid categorical thinking and tantrums (in adults) are strongly associated with autism, but it could also just be simple-mindedness. More data is needed.

His other example was equally bad. Saks attributes her functioning to talking therapy, meds and social support.

So, he gave precisely zero examples. Since he didn't elaborate with an argument there is actually no point actually made.

Ummm. Do you know what ANY of those words mean?!?

I’m simply showing you how others with a serious mental illness have led seemingly normal, successful lives.

Ok, then how about believing something that can easily be proven to be untrue? If any patient told a psychiatrist that he believes he is a werewolf, we’d call that a delusion. We could also easily prove without any doubt that the person is not a werewolf. Same with a man who says, “I’m really a woman trapped in a man’s body.” Easy enough to disprove that.

You’re lying. I posted earlier a website from a clinic that states they do exactly that, start meds immediately.
See post 2705. Seven clinics admitted to doing it.

This place is a ghost town precisely because the mods have let these turbo-posting dipshits overrun every thread.

One of the reasons I don't believe Dr. Fakey is a doctor is his rigidity.
Meisner rigidly believes all clinics operate the same way, prescribe irreversible drugs immediately upon request and that that his one size solution is a cure all for treating people outside his area of expertise. Most doctors I know don't talk in terms of such certainty and absolutism. Most admit their limitations and give some level of respect to the opinions of those that practice in that speciality.

You are gansta both speak like doctors who adhere to accepted communal best practices and recognize the uncertainty of resolving a multifaceted, complex set of problems with one simple solution.

I've had a few surgeries because I believed that I was an athlete. I was not particularly unhappy about my life. Just wanted a limb that matched my self-perception.

It was a little bit over a year of recovery and for over half of that year I was almost completely nonfunctional in many aspects of daily living. Far more extensive recovery and loss of function than if I had wanted one less penis.

I was not mentally ill at the time. I was just willing to go through something difficult to get what I wanted.

Of course, I enjoy having a penis (it brings joy to the masses), so it would take a lot for me to want it removed. If I didn't want it, my opinion would be quite a bit different.

The problem here is that your only understanding of this is from what the websites say, but you don't know what is actually happening in this clinics. Based on my experience and published guidelines, those who are given medications on their first appointment are not those who first identified as trans the day before they made the appointment. They are the people who have known for years and who have already socially transitioned. And since no one actually gets an appointment literally the same day they call, my post is literally like correct.

Yes, but at some point their lives were not normal and were dysfunctional. That doesn't have to ever happen with someone who is trans. I wasn't making the argument that being trans is not a mental illness because they can have normal, functional days, but instead because they can have all their days be normal and functional.

Yet none of you dipshits have offered any science to prove me wrong yet I post study after study. Hmmmm

I’ve been extremely consistent and never said all clinics. Gangsta is the one talking in absolutes when he says it doesn’t happen at all. Fact is it does and I proved him wrong. I do not think all clinics operate the same way. In fact, I happen to know that they do not. The fact that, however, any clinic gives a child those medicines at the first visit without really diving into the situation is beyond f’d up.

I do defer to those who know more than I do. Hell, I’ve named several highly prominent respected psychiatrists. How many has gangsta named? Oh, that’s right, none, even after repeated requests. Do you not think it’s possible if he linked me to some credible research then I’d go read it and maybe, just maybe I would amend my thinking? Sadly, he does not offer that opportunity.
Honestly, based on his reluctance to answer simple, direct questions coupled with his inability to identify any compelling research in his favor, I’m certain gangsta is not a psychiatrist at all. His posting style is almost identical to Bobo who is not a shrink.

One small point: we require guardians to aid in the decision making process in the case of minors.

One major point: We already do the rest of that.

One tiny point: if you can distinguish between yourself and a plate of asparagus, and rarely accidentally ingest a finger because of confusion, you have a sense of self.

One teensy eensy point: if you do lack (on some important level) a sense of self, that would make you negatively qualified to have an opinion on what those who have a sense of self ought do.

…is literally like correct? Wow! What eloquence.

It’s more complicated than this. There is the sense of self described above which requires no conscious self awareness and includes even the most simple-minded animals.

Then, there is the sense of self only accessible through conscious self awareness. This second sense of self is the relevant one to this topic.