ex-President Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at low-info Boomers like my religions aunts. I have two questions:
a) Is anyone here who supports Trump bothered by lies like this?
b) Does anyone know what he's even talking about here? Like is there some grain of truth that he's embellishing on bigly?
Ok and now point to where she perjured herself to win a case.
To spell it out because you're apparently incapable of parsing the most obvious of subtext: Nobody is arguing that there was no perjury, they're pointing out that saying it was to win a case is something you completely made up.
Well if she did commit perjury how would she be allowed to move ahead and prosecute Trump and win the case? Though I do understand your point you are making
I asked a question if there was a previous trans shooter and now there is 2 trans shooters than that would be a rise. Note If . That ultimately proved not to be true as the second shooter was not trans but used different gender names to defraud folks
Just askin' questions!!!
The point is, every time trump does something horrible or is involved in a lawsuit or whatever, you and the rest of the magas go out of your way to try to point the finger at someone else or come up with some sort of nonsense defense when the problem is and has always been, trump.
Im counting at least 4. there have been zero a couple years ago.
you do the math.
The Colorado Springs shooter identified as non binary. The Denver shooter identified as trans. The Aberdeen shooter identified as trans. The Nashville shooter identified as trans.
I asked a question if there was a previous trans shooter and now there is 2 trans shooters than that would be a rise. Note If . That ultimately proved not to be true as the second shooter was not trans but used different gender names to defraud folks
I left the punctuation of your sentence intact. Most people ask questions using a symbol at the end of a sentence. And the above post was a follow up post to:
...
This may be the second shooter that targeted a religious place to shoot up and was trans. There is an extreme part of the trans movement that feel violence is the answer and its a small minority but its concerning
Honest Lozen....loool.
I left the punctuation of your sentence intact. Most people ask questions using a symbol at the end of a sentence. And the above post was a follow up post to:
Honest Lozen....loool.
Hey I am sorry I am not as schooled as you . Ill have just live with that fact. Bless Your Heart on how intelligent you are
Just keep digging that hole, Honest Losern. Nobody but Washoe thinks you have any credibility.
Yeah because the majority of them like you are Biden cultists. At least I can say they’re both horrible candidates
Has a single person in this forum actually said that Biden is a good candidate or is this just another thing you're making up? Pretty much the only person in the entire forum I can think of who might have actively said he was a good candidate (as opposed to defending him from over the top criticism or just saying he's better than Trump/realistic alternatives) is e_d.
Has a single person in this forum actually said that Biden is a good candidate or is this just another thing you're making up? Pretty much the only person in the entire forum I can think of who might have actively said he was a good candidate (as opposed to defending him from over the top criticism or just saying he's better than Trump/realistic alternatives) is e_d.
My guess would be 95% of this board is voting for Biden .
Well I'm not even sure if >50% of (the active posters on) this board are American so that's got to be off by a large distance. It's also completely irrelevant to the question I asked you so I'll ask you again.
Has a single person in this forum actually said that Biden is a good candidate or is this just another thing you're making up?
I think it’s more like :
« My guess would be like 95% of this board is voting against trump . »
Doesn’t matter if it’s Biden or whomever …
People do not love Biden like maga love trump .
Your cultist concept isn’t on democrats side but on republican side shrug .
You get rid of trump as a nominee and the 95% of action in favour of Biden u claim disappear quickly imo …
I mean I would vote for Biden over Trump in a second, but I only think he's decent, not great. There's not a lot of people I wouldn't vote for before Trump.
However, since I'm Canadian, I can't. Yet. I live and work in the southern US and am working on the citizenship thing, so someday soon, hopefully.
Has a single person in this forum actually said that Biden is a good candidate or is this just another thing you're making up?
I did, he is the best (=highest chance of winning) democrat candidate among the list of names that circulated, at least that's what I think as an impartial outside observer.
Maybe not so impartial as I would like a democratic POTUS and a republican majority senate, and given the latter is extremely probable given the electoral map, I am focused on the former.
And for now no name seems to have higher chances than Biden.
Maybe a Newsom supported by the whole party since a year ago could, but that didn't happen so right now Biden is the best name.
Yeah because the majority of them like you are Biden cultists. At least I can say they’re both horrible candidates
They aren't , many actually hate Biden more than you do, but they hate Trump even more (and/or actually believe Trump to be a threat to democracy).
Biden is actually a decent centrist, so of course if you are actually right-wing you won't like him, but Jeeeeez so many names would be so much worse than him.
Start with Harris and think hard for a minute.
Do you understand how much more horrible she would be than Biden?
I did, he is the best (=highest chance of winning) democrat candidate among the list of names that circulated, at least that's what I think as an impartial outside observer.
Maybe not so impartial as I would like a democratic POTUS and a republican majority senate, and given the latter is extremely probable given the electoral map, I am focused on the former.
And for now no name seems to have higher chances than Biden.
Maybe a Newsom supported
He can be the best candidate and still not be a good one (and in fact I actually excluded simply saying he's better than the realistic alternatives the first time I asked the question). I think probably a decent number might say that he's the best of the current options but very few, if any, would say that he's actually a good candidate.
If so many of us are "Biden cultists" as lozen is claiming we are then you'd think there might actually be cases of people saying he's a good candidate.
Struggling with the level of cognitive dissonance required to read through this thread and conclude biden has cultists
Literally no presidential candidate or president in our lifetime has had cultists before, since or after trump
MAGA is a cult. Trump supporters are cultists. These are people who literally stormed the Capitol under false pretense for the purpose of installing their godking. We have not seen anything like this in our lifetime and it’s unlikely we’ll see a demogauge cult of personality like this again. Even if you want to equivocate something something russia when Clinton lost despite having the popular vote as best I can tell BLM didn’t chant to hang biden on the steps of Congress
But ya, you know, biden cultists. As always, serious people engaging seriously
