2024 ELECTION THREAD
The next presidential race will be here soon! Please see current Bovada odds. Thoughts?
10598 Replies
Bernie, Ron Paul, RFK
What happened to RFKs dad btw? Assasinated by two people
For starters, take a look at the amortization breakdown of a 30 eyar loan on how much goes to principle/interest with each year. Honestly, 10 years in might not even get you commissions and fees back.
Home values and rents tend to follow in tandem so if the value of your house were to take a substantial hit you could conceivably be forced to rent out a home at a rent price that is lower than your mortgage payment with taxes and insurance. And selling your home that has dropped 30%, amounting to 40% loss after fees would be a huge disaster for a lot of folks financially on a house that you paid 500K for.
One thing that wasn't discussed a lot in the housing crash of 08 was all the houses that were band aided and dressed up with crooked appraisers and home inspectors in order to sell it to all the cash strapped individuals who were willing to buy.
A lot of those people who bought those houses and ended up underwater didn't realize they also were going to have to pay for an 8-15 ac unit, 20k roof, plumbing repairs, flooring, carpentry or just spending redic amounts of money to bring a house up to code. People have literally committed suicide over being 100k+ in dept and needing additional money to repair something that they needed to fix - all while not being able to rent the house out for enough to pay the mortgage even if they snapped their fingers and found a reliable renter.
Now, in general as a whole buying is a +ev decision imo. But you could literally just take out the largest loan you could and throw it in the S@P and do better. 10% yoy returns will do you better in a lot of cases and wall street wont even ask you to fix their toilets when they go out.
You’re ignoring the price of rent, which you don’t have to pay as an owner
knew i was forgetting more groups they've attacked, and it just came to me: step parents, (probably) divorced/single parents and the unmarried, people without children (especially women, who are ~useless other than breeding). basically everyone outside of straight white conservatives with children on their first marriage.
and probably still more i'm forgetting...
also maga: why are we gonna lose this election ???
fair enough. but oddly trump probably respects gypsies because one scammed him in a game of three-card monte in 1977
very crafty people, i think they do the magic. they're so smart, you wouldn't believe it.
The amount of your taxes/insurance and repairs are likely to be a greater amount than the amount you pay towards your principal payment for a long time. So renters would be saving money in that spot.
Your also need your house to gain 20%+ in value to break even from both ends of buying and selling.
If you're underwater on your house, it's very likely that you won't be able to find tenants to pay enough to cover your mortgage + taxes +insurance and repairs. Which is what a lot of PWs discovered in real life when they got foreclosed on which led to the largest housing crash of 100 years.
The same is true of Apple stock, physical gold, and the $100 bills in your drawer.
Better comparison would be an old piece of furniture, with antiquarian value, you intend to keep though, and you using currently.
Need to compare with something you are using and didn't buy just with the intention of storing value for future consumption, rather with the intention primarily of extracting value by the mere possession of it, with the resellable value only applying far later in time.
If the value of your used car fluctuates that's immaterial to you , is it? ofc what matters is how much if anything it values when you will sell it.
You spend 10k for a top of the line PC setup to play games or work or whatever.
3 months later prices drop dramatically and you could have bought it for 7.5K.
You get sad for a bit because of the "missed savings" but when you bought it was rational for you for your consumption (or work) needs and that's it, why should you care about the fact that the price suddenly dropped more than you expected? other that for irrational , emotional reasons which you should work to eliminate from your mind everytime you think about money?
Cite where renters likely pay less than homeowners due to taxes insurance and repairs.
Nbd if you made it up , just admit it if so
Not to mention rent goes up a ton year after year. Your mortgage stays the same, HOA and taxes may vary a little.
Most houses don’t need lots of repairs lol
Anyway, please cite
Yeah except your rent will go up , your mortgage won’t tho
There’s a big part of having a mortgage that people forget about; rent
Vegas prices
2015 a condo was $60k here and rent was $725 a month. Mortgage plus hoa was like $800
2022 same condo was $180k and rent was $1800 a month. Mortgage and hoa is $1450
Let’s say in 2027 same condo will be worth $220k. Rent will be about $2200 a month.
I don't live in any of those. Plus, should I need some money, I can sell a portion of my stock or gold. It's also a bit easier to sell either than it is to sell a house. $100 bills? Well, I can certainly take one down to the local QwickyMart, buy some gumballs and get $95 change. With a house, not so much.
All of the right-of-center whites love that ****, and there are many millions of them in the US. Combine that, with the baked-in electoral college advantage for Trump (close to going 2 for 2 despite badly losing the popular vote both times), and I think it's important not to bury the guy.
Figuratively, that is. It'd be pretty cool if someone literally buried him. If only that one dork had actually domed Trump on live TV...
Taking the long-term view, I think the Trump phenomenon will be good for Democrats; it's gonna be reallllly hard for the typical Republican to get excited by any of these milquetoast Rubios or Romneys again after a decade of Trump tapping directly into their brain's emotion centers. And we've seen what happens when the DeSantises of the world try to mimic Trump -- they're unable to successfully steal this guy's flow.
Do you pay for the housing you live in out of your own wallet?
But to your point, it doesn't really matter if your the purchasing power of the $100 bill in your drawer goes down if you have no intention of doing anything other than leaving it in your drawer.
I understand that homes are an asset you can live in. I understand that you can't live in a gold bar or a share of Apple stock. I'm not an idiot.
But the reality is that a lot of people rely on the equity in their homes as a safety net. It's something that they can borrow against, or turn into cash through a sale if something goes wrong in their lives. If necessary, it's something they can turn into cash to manage expenses over the last ten years of their lives.
In a perfect world, home owners would have enough savings outside the equity in their homes that they wouldn't have to view their homes in this way.
But that isn't reality for a lot people, at least in the U.S.
I don't understand. I certainly didn't pay for my apartment out of someone else's wallet.
You’re discussing two different things. And you would rather have a safety net (equity) than have nothing to show for renting. Or perhaps a small savings if you have roommates
Ok. Do you understand that there are ways to live inside without paying rent?
You can live with parents. You can live with a significant other. You could have work pay your rent.
So you’re a renter.
Do you honestly think renting is a better option for most people over their lives than buying a home near a city or town?
PW i think the rent v buy comparison requires elements you aren't touching.
A big one is "probability i will want to live in that place in a few years time", if that's not really high, the attrition costs of buying and reselling (realtors mainly, scamming you huge sums, by can be transaction taxes in some countries as well), can push in favor of renting a lot.
And if you don't necessarily intend to live there for very long, you miss out on some of the big advantages of owneship: specific furniture made exactly for your walls/preferences, and renovation to make rooms optimals for your needs.
And before you go "few people move", well not really no, and many don't because they are... stuck with housing but would otherwise, so think of the opportunity cost of owning, in that sense.
Say you are 26 out of college single with a decent job, in a good (cheap) market so you could buy in a meh neighbourhood, a small place. What if you want to make a family? live crammed in the sad neighbourhood with your SO, and 0 chance to have your kids there (because schools suck, but you didn't care when you bought as a young single)?
This is just 1 of 1219023 possible examples,e ven without changing city.
Then there are the big ones that affect everyone like 1) possible future windfalls arriving (inheritance) 2) mortgage rates v rent to yield ratios in your area 3) how much you have unusual needs that the renting market can't satisfy completly 4) etcetera etcetera
I owned, i rented, i even rented while i owned in some moments in life. It's complicated
???
It can be. It's a math problem.
I know that you appreciate the point. I'm just noting that "need to sell or need to borrow against the equity" isn't some sort of edge case life condition that we can exclude from consideration when deciding whether there is real world impact to declines in housing prices.
I think it's the difference between knowing the option is there if you need it, and actually exercising it.
Correct. It really depends on where you live, what your financial situation is, and the state of the mortgage market.
It's not only math for many reasons.
One being for example that getting a mortgage forces you to save (the equity portion of each payment is savings).
The more you aren't otherwise capable to save regardlessly, the more getting a mortgage makes for you specifically sense and viceversa, ceteris paribus.
For you, perhaps. But the options you describe would not be real options for a great many people, including me. If I suddenly lost my home and all my liquid assets, it would not be practical for me to move my family to my mother's house. Off the top of my head, I don't know any friends that could accommodate my family for any significant length of time. I certainly don't get housing through my job. I would have to take my paycheck and pay rent in order to keep a roof over my family's head.
So you’re a renter.
Do you honestly think renting is a better option for most people over their lives than buying a home near a city or town?
For you, perhaps.
I never said anything about renting being a better or worse option for most people. I don't know how you got that from my posts.