[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff
KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.
If you still think that AQ did 9/11 you should be in adult day care.
Any factually correct piece of evidence for a conspiracy theory (including identifying a motive) increases the chances it is true. Even the ridiculous ones like we didn't land on the moon or that Trump was behind his own assassination attempt. The problem is that the conspiracy theorists don't apply Bayes Theorem. If, without that evidence, the theory was a million to one shot, the evidence could very well simply turn it into a thousand to
Thoughts on this one that I posted in other news. I'm wondering how much your take will match with mine
I apologise in advance
British tech tycoon Mike Lynch and his 18-year-old daughter are among the six people missing after a luxury yacht sank off the coast of the Italian island of Sicily in the early hours of Monday morning.
The 56m (183ft) vessel was carrying 22 people including British, American and Canadian nationals. Fifteen people were rescued, including a one-year-old British girl, and authorities are continuing their search into the night.
Mr Lynch, known by some as "the British Bill Gates", co-founded software company Autonomy, which was later bought by tech giant Hewlett-Packard for $11bn (£8.6bn).
Mr Lynch sold his company Autonomy to American computing giant Hewlett-Packard (HP) in 2011 for $11bn (£8.6bn).
But an intense legal battle following the high-profile acquisition loomed over Mr Lynch for over a decade. He was acquitted in the US in June on multiple fraud charges, for which he had been facing two decades in jail.
Nothing suspicious is being reported afaik
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/cre...
The sinking of the yacht came on the same day that Mr Lynch's co-defendant in the fraud case, Stephen Chamberlain, was confirmed by his lawyer as having died after being hit by a car in Cambridgeshire on Saturday.
wtf? Will Baysian analysis help or has that ship already sunk?
You should include the fact that the driver was a 49 year old woman from Haddenham, Cambridgeshire.
Now do Diana Spencer's death.
That is indeed a significant fact. Which way though?
Yes but it is very easy to construct an alternate route to the evidence. We've already seen a plague of this happening in U.S. domestic cases where cops tap surveillance data in an illegal way to get evidence then lie about how they found that evidence. You torture KSM and get him to say where some evidence is. You send people in to get it. You say you got a tip from an informant. No risk.
But we should have the evidence anyway. We raided Bi
Whats your opinion on the Apollo 11 mission?
Or that he didn't send those bombs. I'm sure the evidence is not any stronger than 9/11. And I don't believe you can think any better than your posting itt.
You seemed like the reasonable one at first, but lately you've taken to spouting some real nonsense. There was a lot of evidence against the Kaczynski. They made a whole documentary about it. He got a plea deal because, like I said, he has a very compelling insanity case. In this country if you are judged to be sufficiently mentally compromised when you committed crimes you have a good chance of not being held criminally accountable. If you can't just admit you picked a very bad example, or just come up with another one, then you just suck at this.
You seemed like the reasonable one at first, but lately you've taken to spouting some real nonsense. There was a lot of evidence against the Kaczynski. They made a whole documentary about it. He got a plea deal because, like I said, he has a very compelling insanity case. In this country if you are judged to be sufficiently mentally compromised when you committed crimes you have a good chance of not being held criminally accountable. If you
And KSM was tortured. Granted it doesn't matter anyway since the deal was thrown out and you had to invent a reason on the spot why that made sense also.
I only came in because there was a claim about basic physics that I should be able to understand if you're correct but you seem scared to explain it now. People can draw their own conclusions about why.
I don't question any of the NASA missions. I don't go against scientific or technical consensus. One of the points I've been trying to make here is that there is no actual scientific consensus on the collapse of the buildings, only a thin veneer of scientific consensus which is easily seen through if you don't bury your hand in the sand. It's also seen if you don't close your eyes shut, cover your ears, and scream "I'm not listening I'm not listening" which describes most of team sheeple here.
I believe the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen by Bush.
I believe there have been substantial manipulation of elections by way of electronic voting - these have been documented by academic researchers though largely ignored by the media.
I believe the government has been actively censoring political speech through collusion with social media companies.
I believe the most of the outlandish stories implicating our enemies du jour in bizarre plots against us are totally made up. I can spot these a mile away and I'm always proven right. "Havana syndrome" for example has proven to be a total hoax.
I believe the reporting on UFOs as being evidence of advanced alien technology on earth is an exploratory PSYOP designed to test the limits of what our masters can get us to believe. I'd be interested to know what the sheeple think of this one. They are kinda in a bind because they yearn to believe whatever master says but master hasn't been entirely clear plus they still have some common sense and rationality. The sheeple might not know which mode of thinking to apply here. They probably don't like thinking about the issue as it is likely a source of cognitive dissonance for them.
The minds of the paranoid conspiracy theorists would be fascinating if they weren't so dangerous to society.
If they can make either side do what they want why does it matter what team wins elections? Is that where they're allowed to have a little freedom fighting amongst each other to see who gets to wear the ballgag?
If they can make either side do what they want why does it matter what team wins elections? Is that where they're allowed to have a little freedom fighting amongst each other to see who gets to wear the ballgag?
It doesn't matter and a lot of it is just for the purpose of throwing money at media.
Why are there red and blue states? There would be no need to escape blue zones to the red zones(and vice versa) if they were exactly the same thing.
What part of SoCal? I'm in HB. Doesn't get more Trumpy than over here. Constant rallies at the pier, banning books, removing gay pride flags from city buildings.
I'm in rural San Diego county. I haven't been here too long but I'm not aware of anything like you're describing here-- but it definitely feels pretty Trumpy. Lots of people owning horses.
I believe the most of the outlandish stories implicating our enemies du jour in bizarre plots against us are totally made up. I can spot these a mile away and I'm always proven right.
The bolded word doesn't mean what you think it means.
You literally just claimed to have been "proven right" about 9/11 because KSM got a plea deal lol. The only thing you have "proved" without question so far in this thread is your limited intelligence and understanding of how basic logic and argumentation works.
Imagine thinking the CIA needs to invent goofy conspiracy **** for people to believe in.
I didn't say I thought it was the CIA. The government knowingly, continually, and brazenly lies to you. And often you find out it was a lie when the government later acknowledges it.
Trolly, how many times does someone have to lie to you before you stop believing every word they say?
Some people in power, I hypothesize, want to know how big of a lie they can tell you and still maintain credibility with you.
So can I get a straight answer? Do you believe there is alien technology on Earth stupefying our military aviators with physics defying movements? I guess after 911 they know physics is a degree of freedom allowing them to put physical impossibilities into any narrative. You're supposed to have a PhD in hard science and you can't follow David Chandler's video? Of course you can. You choose not to expose yourself to the possibility that 911 was a domestic act or an act of some state out of fear of the responsibility such a revelation would confer.
The bolded word doesn't mean what you think it means.
You literally just claimed to have been "proven right" about 9/11 because KSM got a plea deal lol. The only thing you have "proved" without question so far in this thread is your limited intelligence and understanding of how basic logic and argumentation works.
Actually I believe I said it's not proof on the KSM claim. But I don't want to explain why because you have already identified yourself as someone who doesn't understand the difficulty of proving a negative and that concept would be used in the explanation.
