[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff
KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.
If you still think that AQ did 9/11 you should be in adult day care.
I don't know, but if not, the question would be what happened to the people on the flights...I do have my suspicians unfortunatly for those people and what about the "plane" in PA which left a small ditch of dug up dirt with no wreckage of a plane and also the Pentagon appears to be a misile as well. Those two were more likely not planes than the first two.
Deuces, are you able to give us a rough calculation of the force exerted on the towers by the impacts of the planes?
Sure. force = not enough to knock down the towers.
You didn't say physics calculation. I would only link to experts to do actual math, although I think some math was argued in the other thread by me. I try to expose myself to trolling which is only so fun for the trolls. I'm not going to do actual work in here just to have people that don't know anything pretend it's invalid.
Sure. force = not enough to knock down the towers.
You didn't say physics calculation. I would only link to experts to do actual math, although I think some math was argued in the other thread by me. I try to expose myself to trolling which is only so fun for the trolls. I'm not going to do actual work in here just to have people that don't know anything pretend it's invalid.
I'm confused. I thought experts were not to be trusted. You wrote a long treatise on how all the experts have been compromised, remember? Oh, wait, they can be trusted if you personally agree with their conclusions, right?
Spoiler
I don't know, but if not, the question would be what happened to the people on the flights...I do have my suspicians unfortunatly for those people and what about the "plane" in PA which left a small ditch of dug up dirt with no wreckage of a plane and also the Pentagon appears to be a misile as well. Those two were more likely not planes than the first two.
Seems reasonable, my personal confusion there would be if you had a legitmate airliner hit rhe towers, why would the govt simultanously fire a missle at the pentagon and at some random field in Penn.
It would seem far more likely that a boarded plane didnt hit than pulling off a atunt like that?
How was is possible two buildings of that size could be turned mostly into dust and into a pile of only a couple stories high? The news anchors and social media fact checkers seem to keep disagreeing with all the experts in the field we should actually be listening to...
They didn't turn to dust, you houseplant.
I don't know, but if not, the question would be what happened to the people on the flights...I do have my suspicians
If your suspician [sic] is that they died when it crashed into the buildings, you would be correct. Otherwise, no. You know they found lots of parts of them, right? You know there are photographs of this, right (don't look that up, just trust me).
Who told you that it was a small ditch of dug up dirt and there was no plane wreckage? That's all quite literally OBVIOUSLY incorrect.
and also the Pentagon appears to be a misile as well. Those two were more likely not planes than the first two.
No and no.
Hope that helped!
Sure. force = not enough to knock down the towers.
You didn't say physics calculation. I would only link to experts to do actual math, although I think some math was argued in the other thread by me. I try to expose myself to trolling which is only so fun for the trolls. I'm not going to do actual work in here just to have people that don't know anything pretend it's invalid.
That’s so obvious, as the buildings didn’t fall upon impact. Unless, of course, you don’t believe they were hit by planes.
My question is what are the calculations of the force actual exerted on the towers and how much for were they designed to withstand?
in fairness, the video of it hitting the pentagon does look like a missile because it's only recording one out of every few frames (idk but that's what it looks like) so it's clear and then fireball, you do not see a plane approaching
but the real question is, since this video came from the pentagon itself, why would they release such a shoddy video of the missile when they could just avoid someone saying "hey that's not a plane that's a missile" and just not release any videos?
in fairness, the video of it hitting the pentagon does look like a missile because it's only recording one out of every few frames (idk but that's what it looks like) so it's clear and then fireball, you do not see a plane approaching
but the real question is, since this video came from the pentagon itself, why would they release such a shoddy video of the missile when they could just avoid someone saying "hey that's not a plane that's a mis
From what you can see, how big of a missile would you say it looks at the 5 sec mark?
Dunces, there are 121 footnotes in the Mohamed Atta wikipedia article. Do you know how many of them reference the book you seem to dislike so much, and based on which you are dismissing the whole article? I'll give you a clue, it's the same number as you would score on a test of intellectual honesty.
How was is possible two buildings of that size could be turned mostly into dust and into a pile of only a couple stories high? The news anchors and social media fact checkers seem to keep disagreeing with all the experts in the field we should actually be listening to...
Hmm. My brother lived in the lower east side on 9/11 and hopped on his bike with his camera that morning and starting riding toward the WTC. He captured a stunning image of WTC2 right as the top started to tip and fall. He watched it fall and took a few more pics then got the **** out of there. I've long debated whether to post the pic but it's his property and he's never given me permission to.
They have the technology on both sides but luckily the good side recently took over the Yal-2 from the bad side, a specially designed 747 (which was involved with wildfires in HI and TX and earlier in Paridise, CA and possibly started the fires in eastern Canada that covered NYC in orange a while back of which I shared the video proof of dozens of major fires starting over hundreds of miles all at exactly the same time).
I see. What is the reason the people who own this awesome technology start fires with it?
I see. What is the reason the people who own this awesome technology start fires with it?
Misdirection to buy time to forge ballots and rob Trump of his rightful 2020 election victory ldo. Once you've seen the big picture like PlayBigBrain and Deuces McLogicGenius, all the pieces start to fit.
And careful, you know what's gonna happen to those who ask too many questions:
Space lasers are no joke bruh.
To push their global warming agenda, to punish a state for going against them, to grab land, etc.
One day everyone will soon realize the world wasn't being run by who they thought it was. It's not all roses and cherries out there.
To push their global warming agenda, to punish a state for going against them, to grab land, etc.
One day everyone will soon realize the world wasn't being run by who they thought it was. It's not all roses and cherries out there.
Do these weapons work by causing fires or destroying infractures by collapse? Where are these weapons kept? In space?
This shows why a plane crashing into the pentagon is consistent with all of the evidence including the video shown a few posts up.
but the real question is, since this video came from the pentagon itself, why would they release such a shoddy video of the missile when they could just avoid someone saying "hey that's not a plane that's a missile" and just not release any videos?
Not only that, but the FBI confiscated every outdoor security camera footage from businesses that may or may not have captured it.
Not only that, but the FBI confiscated every outdoor security camera footage from businesses that may or may not have captured it.
If only the technology to copy security camera footage prior to surrendering it to the FBI had been available in 2001, we might have all the answers we need today. Oh well, c'est la vie.
This shows why a plane crashing into the pentagon is consistent with all of the evidence including the video shown a few posts up.
What evidence? Where did the airplane go then and why wasn't there any wreckage (besides a couple inflated tires photographed at the scene later that day while the real tires would of been tucked away in the cowling since I don't think a hijacker planning to hit a building is worried about retracting the landing gear before crashing).
We can't rely on fact checking sites on the internet. They've already been proven to be lying about many things which turned out to be true from hunter's laptop to MK Ultra. Also, you don't fly an airplane that low to the ground due to what's referred to as ground effect which would of kept it balooning into the air. It didn't taxi into the building.
What evidence? Where did the airplane go then and why wasn't there any wreckage (besides a couple inflated tires photographed at the scene later that day while the real tires would of been tucked away in the cowling since I don't think a hijacker planning to hit a building is worried about retracting the landing gear before crashing).
We can't rely on fact checking sites on the internet. They've already been proven to be lying about many th
Cite on fact checking sites lying about MK Ultra please.
Maybe you should watch the video, chief. It's very clearly displayed.
Into the pentagon and then disintegrated. What the hell did you think happened?
You really should watch the video. You look ridiculous right now.
Also, you don't fly an airplane that low to the ground due to what's referred to as ground effect which would of kept it balooning into the air. It didn't taxi into the building.
Good point. This is what's made landing airplanes impossible for the last 120+ years. I don't know how we forgot. Luckily, we have some real super secret techniques that allow us to pull that off these days.
Good point. This is what's made landing airplanes impossible for the last 120+ years. I don't know how we forgot.
Ah, that explains the millions of airplanes and billions of people in the air right now, just waiting until we invent the technology to allow them to land. I was wondering what was going on with that.
Of course they did. You know they had to do an investigation right? Why would this be even slightly surprising?
What's surprising is they released the video above in an effort to disprove the "conspiracy theories" that a plane didn't hit the pentagon. If they had all those other videos, why didn't they release a clearer video of an actual airplane?
