Who Shot dJRt
In the sense that he was either shot or hit by debris, yes. In regards to ss failures, no.
Usually a bullet wound has some signs of burning because of the heat from the projectile. The only medical doctor claiming he shot was his primary, Dr. Jackson. Of course, HIPPA but things leak when famous people are involved.
In the sense that he was either shot or hit by debris, yes. In regards to ss failures, no.
Usually a bullet wound has some signs of burning because of the heat from the projectile. The only medical doctor claiming he shot was his primary, Dr. Jackson. Of course, HIPPA but things leak when famous people are involved.
Did you read this? What evidence, if any, do you rely on for your theory it was glass or shrapnel rather than the bullet?
I'm all for various conspiracies, but helps when there is something to further that theory other than random hopium.
FYI, independent researchers just let us know this past week that all tampons contain toxic metals, arsenic, and lead, so probably best to avoid. (Very relevant information for women who have been poisoning themselves once a month for the past forever lol…)
So, more of a health threat than Trump actually experienced?
Ugh!
Ok Rococo you get a point. Enjoy it. I have to give up the argument anyway because now the repubs are using it on Harris. The people saying Snow White isn't white enough are now saying Kamala isn't black enough. So F it I'm done with it. I don't need to be the one person being like "hold on what about slavery and the transgenerational maladaptations imposed by the world's greatest historical evil" if no one else gives a **** and the ones pretending to are the biggest racists.
put your hand up if you said Crooks was a Republican. i can't be bothered to search and quotepost all of them
seems articulate. why are they censoring his handle if they're showing the @s and full text of his tweets?
seems articulate. why are they censoring his handle if they're showing the @s and full text of his tweets?
i'm not sure. but it's epicmicrowave - was shared elsewhere
ill look into this but why would someone supporting biden post on gab...? like really? the right wing site?
Ok Rococo you get a point. Enjoy it. I have to give up the argument anyway because now the repubs are using it on Harris. The people saying Snow White isn't white enough are now saying Kamala isn't black enough. So F it I'm done with it. I don't need to be the one person being like "hold on what about slavery and the transgenerational maladaptations imposed by the world's greatest historical evil" if no one else gives a **** and the ones pr
I assume that your last sentence is not directed at me. I never said anything that could be fairly interpreted as indifference to the historical legacy of slavery in the U.S.
I don't know exactly which comments from Republicans you saw, but I fully expected Trump and company to go full dog whistle.
Did you read this? What evidence, if any, do you rely on for your theory it was glass or shrapnel rather than the bullet?
I'm all for various conspiracies, but helps when there is something to further that theory other than random hopium.
I don't have a theory, I asked a question. I didn't claim divine intervention or rely on a crackpots reconstruction video. But I do think we should change the title to "Who shot at djt" until we find out or at least fix the initials.
So a violent Republican dipshit had an account on a Nazi social media platform, that checks out.
I'll hold out judgement until we have proof that this Tobra guy isn't lying like these people are prone to do.
Questionable:
we know accuracy and truthfulness aren't high on his list of priorities, but it would matter in the sense that in one case he was actually shot and in the other case he wasn't
Of course. I just don't seem a huge difference between "shot at and nicked by the bullet" and "shot at and nicked by flying debris caused by the bullet."
Of course. I just don't seem a huge difference between "shot at and nicked by the bullet" and "shot at and nicked by flying debris caused by the bullet."
The fairly obvious difference is that the rifle bullet, on a fractionally different trajectory, would have entered his skull and killed him, which a speck of debris from a teleprompter (and there was no such debris, because it's clear that the teleprompters weren't hit) wouldn't.
The guy died.
But if you’re implying there is a bigger conspiracy good luck. We still have wild conspiracies around Kennedy 50 years later
It's over 60 years now, and the conspiracy theories persist just because people like to entertain themselves, because they find a solved case unentertaining and prefer to pretend it wasn't solved at all and because, surprisingly often, they literally cannot tell the difference between an entertainment (like Oliver Stone's dopey made-up film) and actuality.
It's a silly argument and hill to die on. Like who really cares what hit him, if anything at all. Someone tried to assassinate him and fired at least one round, probably more at him.
When people shoot guns at you, it's traumatising. He's handling it pretty well imo.
I mean look at the cost of mental health counselling for Jan 6 riot victims.
It's over 60 years now, and the conspiracy theories persist just because people like to entertain themselves, because they find a solved case unentertaining and prefer to pretend it wasn't solved at all and because, surprisingly often, they literally cannot tell the difference between an entertainment (like Oliver Stone's dopey made-up film) and actuality.
65% of Americans believe there was a conspiracy in JFK killing. So if you're on team narrative/lone gunman you're in a smaller set of the population.
You don't realize how many Dem and Repubs are registering opposite to vote in the other's primaries. I'm a reg'd Dem and my father, who's a raging libtard, is a reg'd Repub. This is extremely common nowadays. Why don't they just look at his voting record instead?
The gaslighting that right wing white's are the biggest threat to "democracy" is only believed by a very special segment of society. Can anyone site a politically motivated violent act carried out by a Trump supporter (Jan 6 is not an answer)? I can only seem to find the opposite. Classic projection:
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/man-...
It's a silly argument and hill to die on. Like who really cares what hit him, if anything at all. Someone tried to assassinate him and fired at least one round, probably more at him.
When people shoot guns at you, it's traumatising. He's handling it pretty well imo.
I mean look at the cost of mental health counselling for Jan 6 riot victims.
Wait...who were the Jan 6 victims? AOC?? Only person killed was a defenseless female veteran. Looooooool. Funny how leftist "mostly peaceful" protests don't traumatize anyone, but waving people into the Capitol and taking pictures with them is a mental health crisis.
