[GGPoker]: Natural8, etc
Anybody heard of this site? If yes, how is it?
You play a massive ammount of small pots so you end up paying rake and would do better with more strd style imo.
yes, thanks. btw, I checked in hand2note.. I paid 212$ in rake on 25nl rush&cash for yesterdays session (14.000 hands), and icing on the cake is that I was 4bi under ev.. poker is fun! 😃
and, icing on the icing on the turd cake: I opted in for the killer whale promo which offers ''50% rakeback", paid 212$ in rake and made 50$ rakeback.. now, if my math is correct that would be 24% rakeback.. so I am thinking that killer whale promo is actually 50% of the 50% rakeback back! GOOD GAME!
yes, thanks. btw, I checked in hand2note.. I paid 212$ in rake on 25nl rush&cash for yesterdays session (14.000 hands), and icing on the cake is that I was 4bi under ev.. poker is fun! 😃
and, icing on the icing on the turd cake: I opted in for the killer whale promo which offers ''50% rakeback", paid 212$ in rake and made 50$ rakeback.. now, if my math is correct that would be 24% rakeback.. so I am thinking that killer whale promo is actua
If you are not familiar with gg buffet then google ggpoker + pvi.
Is there a way to delete all player notes? Didnt do a good job marking ppl and would like to start over
Yes…go to pokercraft/notes, mark them all/delete
nothing strange about it. These are player who focus on massive volume & rakeback instead of good play, thats why they lose pre rakeback. A lot of them probably are making a profit after rakeback. Of all the shadyness & wrongdoing on GG this wouldnt make the top 10.
interesting thread about to rake and hand histories
If something is old news then this is like pre jesus time old.
It is and always has been completely standard for high volume pros to have a winrate lower than the rake, but higher than the rakeback-adjusted remainder of the rake, and end up as a "rakeback pro". It seems that the 200nl rake on GG is around 12bb/100 which is of course absolutely massive, and with 50% rakeback being a rakeback pro would mean you win between 6 and 12 bb per 100. Any less is a losing player and any more is the highly esteemed pre-rakeback crusher!
It is and always has been completely standard for high volume pros to have a winrate lower than the rake, but higher than the rakeback-adjusted remainder of the rake, and end up as a "rakeback pro". It seems that the 200nl rake on GG is around 12bb/100 which is of course absolutely massive, and with 50% rakeback being a rakeback pro would mean you win between 6 and 12 bb per 100. Any less is a losing player and any more is the highly esteem
looks like you never play on GG, so it is better to first find out info and then write. NOBODY has 50% rakeback at nl200. You get max 14% rakeback from fish buffet not 50%
NOBOY can be high volume on GG, becuase there is NOT ENOUGH FISH to be high volume
PVI has no impact on tournament rakeback correct?
What makes you think that?
looks like you never play on GG, so it is better to first find out info and then write. NOBODY has 50% rakeback at nl200. You get max 14% rakeback from fish buffet not 50%
NOBOY can be high volume on GG, becuase there is NOT ENOUGH FISH to be high volume
When you add everything up you get atleast close to 50%. GGs rakeback is scattered all over the place. Fwiw lb grinders don't seem to care about the rec/reg ratio. They just play 24hrs to win the lb - take a break - repeat.
looks like you never play on GG, so it is better to first find out info and then write. NOBODY has 50% rakeback at nl200. You get max 14% rakeback from fish buffet not 50%
NOBOY can be high volume on GG, becuase there is NOT ENOUGH FISH to be high volume
"it is better to first find out info and then write" okay let's do that then
Unfortunately no one is getting that after pvi. Maybe some massive vip whale but for majority of the players it's 25% at best. They also promote it on the site up to 50% cashback. Not 50% cashback.
Amazing how people on the internet can be so confident and so wrong at the same time. Sometimes it results in looking very stupid.
You have no clue about PVI but feel like you should post about rakeback % anyways.
but players who lose a lot have a lot better pvi, still they dont get the advertised 50% but claiming its max 14% is very wrong
But dont start winning otherwise your pvi will be 0.25 very quickly
Amazing how people on the internet can be so confident and so wrong at the same time. Sometimes it results in looking very stupid.
You have no clue about PVI but feel like you should post about rakeback % anyways.
I'll just snap accept any evidence that shows the max rakeback is 14%, I'm easily convinced by facts.
you need need fish to reach high volume, you just need other players. And they are plenty around
you need fish to reach a high winrate, thats why most of these players lose pre rb
unfortunately, everyone who has at least avg IQ never plays tables like this. (and it is almost every second talbe like this, that everyone on table lose)
I'll just snap accept any evidence that shows the max rakeback is 14%, I'm easily convinced by facts.
Here you have proofs, since my 2M hands played on GG is not enough
streamer dios total fish buffet in december 10% (fish buffet+ christmass box)
Streamer Galamao 14,9% fish buffet from 60% while losing pre rb -1bb/100
