Biggest loser in online poker history wants to grind $16k

Biggest loser in online poker history wants to grind $16k

I start this with some pictures:

nl2 -$8792.18 -82 buy ins below EV


nl5 (notice that pt4 shows party poker nl5 as nl4) -$5943.81


nl10 -$773.92 -15 buy ins below EV


Total loss -$15509.91


This is me playing nl2, nl5 and nl10 on party poker for one year.

My history begins somewhere in same period when they started to show WSOP shows in television. I think I have played 12-13 years nows mainly NL2, some amount of NL5 and little bit of NL10 what is the biggest stake i've ever played.

I've read all Sklansky, all Harrington, all Miller, watched huge amount of videos, bought trackers and calculators.

Still after those years and after that all I've lost huge amount of money on those stakes. I try to play my best but losing to huge suckouts like 95/5 favorite makes me really upset.

I've lost literally all my money including all my life savings to online poker. I want to try one last time to win those money back and little bit of extra. That's why $16k. What I need is support and guiding.

I had thread on micro forum but they deleted it just when people start to understand that this is real situation and not fake.

And if you wonder where that biggest loser comes from it was said by guy who has been playing for living many years. He said I'm the biggest loser in history counted as lost buy ins.

18 March 2019 at 01:30 PM
Reply...

584 Replies

i
a

by 1kSuns P

What is your overall win/loss ratio when flipping with 98% AI equity? Can you check that out in your database?

2 post makes you just Eastyy or that another annoying british arrogant Mark or whatever I don't remember his nickname. Both got massive amount from sites to promote.

But really 98% equity, it's something that Doug Polk needs to talk about.


So toxic... Why is it a problem to post the ratio? Is it because it actually shows you win your fair share?


Your net profit from all suckouts is +$50 in your favour though


by Paisting P

What's is in your brain that you won't see that I lose every month more to suckouts than any else can show?=

Your graphs for the last few months show that you are winning more due to suckouts (or, more accurately, losing less) than losing. Your graphs show that you are losing money due to poor play, not suckouts. Also, 98% < 100%. Yes, sometimes (2% of the time) people lose with 98% equity - you're really lucky that this is the first time it's happened to you with all the years you've been playing (It's happened to me at least 3 times that I remember).


by 1kSuns P

So toxic... Why is it a problem to post the ratio? Is it because it actually shows you win your fair share?

Because Eastyy is whale. Just look his streams. His open size is ridiculous low. He opens, 3 people call. He checks and even half brain caller understand to bluff bet and Eastyy fold. First poker book ever written says " you wanna bet maximum they call". Eastyy is bread and butter.

Second check how much he folds to river bets. 85% river bets and all are bluffs on 888, Eastyy makes just absolutely idiot folds on river.

And third, everythime he checks on draw heavy board just push all in he folds.

If this is normal whale I don't say anything but he is promoted player from 888. That means he got money from that site. When I outplay him that is my bread and butter against him he get money from site.

And his promoting pc tables. Pro tip, mac software is not updated so you have significant equity to play with not forced avatars.


Who can chat with me here now? I want to play more poker. Either build a bankroll online in .05/.10 ---or just keep going to casino and play 1/2 NL. In the latter case I should have a bankroll of $5000 to $10000.

Or should I start lower and grind online for awhile and try to get a $500 bankroll up to $5000 - $10000 and then go to casino again. Thanks.


this is not the hijack this thread deserves


Paisting what a lucky idiot you are - again running unbelievable high over EV

Biggest idiot has all the luck


Here you go paisting. this is for you

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...

Dont come back until you and the AI can beat Linus HU pls.


each month now we're getting some good breakeven/winning before an unavoidable downturn.

maybe a winning month is on the way.


by Tuma P

each month now we're getting some good breakeven/winning before an unavoidable downturn.

maybe a winning month is on the way.

If there is month without or with just few suckouts winning month is definitely possible. The player pool is full of whales. They are worst than couple of years ago and now when tested other sites too the pool of 888 is more whales than any other site. My screen blinking green when every one has whale tag. I literally run them over almost in every hand. They bet small I bet big and take their money. Only thing keeps them not to lose all money is suckouts. If I keep losing hands with 98% equity you can be sure there is no winning months.


by Kendoo P

Paisting what a lucky idiot you are - again running unbelievable high over EV

Biggest idiot has all the luck

It's unbelievable how lucky he is, some people would pay to run like him (not in life).


by Paisting P

Because Eastyy is whale. Just look his streams. His open size is ridiculous low. He opens, 3 people call. He checks and even half brain caller understand to bluff bet and Eastyy fold. First poker book ever written says " you wanna bet maximum they call". Eastyy is bread and butter.

Second check how much he folds to river bets. 85% river bets and all are bluffs on 888, Eastyy makes just absolutely idiot folds on river.

And third, everythime h

U should take Eastyy and all the [emoji229] like him on a journey...and punish them on random rivers!

Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk


by disident P

U should take Eastyy and all the [emoji229] like him on a journey...

You know what does when I enter in pool and he has stream on? He’s out in 20 minutes or faster with absolute ridiculous excuses.

This has happened many times and at first I didn’t even knew he was streaming.

And if we think why so it’s really obvious that he can’t take the humiliation where I can put him. I post every bluff and outplay to my topic. I put him play lots of big pots he won’t like to play. I make him look stupid and he knows that. He’s marketing those games and losing to Paisting is not looking really good.

That’s why those sessions where I’m in are really short.


I make him look stupid and he knows that

Can you post the hero vs villain results vs him? I'm curious to see how much you crush him.


Again, 95% equity not enough. Against total whale. How many you got these per month?

888Poker Snap, Hold'em No Limit - $0.05/$0.10 - 6 players

Tr7777777 (UTG): $8.38 (84 bb)
Paisting (MP): $10.25 (103 bb)
braywa777 (CO): $10.00 (100 bb)
kox44x (BU): $19.69 (197 bb)
lolahoy (SB): $3.93 (39 bb)
song4sunset (BB): $10.65 (107 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.15) Hero (Paisting) is MP with 3 3
Tr7777777 (UTG) calls $0.10, Paisting (MP) raises to $0.50, 2 players fold, lolahoy (SB) calls $0.45, 1 fold, Tr7777777 (UTG) calls $0.40

Flop: ($1.60) 3 2 4 (3 players)
lolahoy (SB) bets $1.05, Tr7777777 (UTG) folds, Paisting (MP) raises to $9.75 (all-in), lolahoy (SB) calls $2.38 (all-in)

Turn: ($8.46) 6 (2 players, 2 all-in)

River: ($8.46) 5 (2 players, 2 all-in)

Total pot: $8.46 (Rake: $0.42)

Showdown:
Paisting (MP) shows 3 3 (a straight, Two to Six)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 51%, Flop: 95%, Turn: 95%, River: 50%)

lolahoy (SB) shows J Q (a straight, Two to Six)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 49%, Flop: 5%, Turn: 5%, River: 50%)

Paisting (MP) wins $4.02
lolahoy (SB) wins $4.02


Let us know when you loose a 100% equity hand [emoji28]


by FlorinMC P

Let us know when you loose a 100% equity hand [emoji28]

I think that 98% was practical 100%. People are calling with absolut nothing on those boards but still they win.


well, thats actually the first time i see a villain play a hand worse than paisting


by Slugant P

well, thats actually the first time i see a villain play a hand worse than paisting

That playing style is called ”shitting in pants”. You multiply your mistakes until all your moves you make are mistakes. First desperate call, then when you understand you have nothing desperate shitting in pants bet and then after I literally open my cards you still make desperate call.

As you can see all moves are desperate. And why? Because I run those players over. They can only play defensive and more they go defensive the more I run them over.

Skalansky wrote about how poker is winning mistakes game. I won it by 100-0 but still losing money.

When 888 player pool is so poor and worst that you can find it’s little bit hilarious when you compare it to GG’s. On 888 you have at normal days like 40 players in pool maximum but on GG there are 400 players. When comparing stats where there is blinking green whales on 888 with massive whale stats, the majority of GG pool are nits. Nits playing against nits when there are huge whale pool on other way. And you can’t even use hud on GG. People are strange.


by Paisting P


Skalansky wrote about how poker is winning mistakes game. I won it by 100-0 but still losing money.

Ask Sklansky if he thinks that 98 = 100


by Tappy Tibbons P

Ask Sklansky if he thinks that 98 = 100

My respect for Skalansky is not so good at the moment because he suggest and teaches limping in his new book.


Imagine being that stupid to moan about losing 39bbs at NL10 after being down six figures at the smallest games possible. It's so sad you are breaking the only good thing you had going : I will never play higher than N2. You are so stupid.


by ImePaskaa P

Imagine being that stupid to moan about losing 39bbs at NL10 after being down six figures at the smallest games possible. It's so sad you are breaking the only good thing you had going : I will never play higher than N2. You are so stupid.

Of all the good advice he's ignored over the years, the one piece of "advice" he actually listed to was "move up to where they respect your raises"


Mr. Manson sums up this thread quite well:
"I make the money, man! I rule the nicke...


Reply...