ex-President Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at low-info Boomers like my religions aunts. I have two questions:
a) Is anyone here who supports Trump bothered by lies like this?
b) Does anyone know what he's even talking about here? Like is there some grain of truth that he's embellishing on bigly?
8575 Replies
Yeah, but J6 was speaking out for the ever so oppressed white middle-aged class. Someone needs to speak up for them, because their voice is so rarely heard in the halls of power.
classic lozen and baham logic.
comparing 1 event in january 6 with thousand (7k+) of blm protest = same.
I never compared the two at all. Someone stated they were unsure if anyone was killed at the BLM riots ? I answered
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictiona...
insurrection:
an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government.
Why january 6 happens again exactly ?
im sure it was about a establishing a new government something something.
guys remember when the democrats caused the rodney king riots?? can't believe they played that card again...
But actually we were discussing anti-Trump riots, some of which happened in 2016-17. If anyone died in those, feel free to inform us.
Also lozen: I’m not a trump supporter at all! I hate trump! I just don’t have a choice!
He's ready. Soup is now being served at this first ever criminal trial iirc with a president as defendant.
In not sure I have ever indicated you were a Trump supporter . I am not sure why you would not have a choice? I always found hate such a strong word though I understand folks hating Trump as I have a hate for our leader as well. Never ever thought I would and just recently able to say that . I also get why folks hate Trump
Hahahahahaha. Loool. Thanks for the laughs.
Yeah, that was something. Also, kinda pisses a little over the theory that it doesn't matter if you use bad grammar or punctuation, everyone will always know what you mean. But in that case I think there were enough context clues to figure it out!
I mean, whatever the hell this was
Or this odd exchange in the modration thread:
I guess it's some weird joke, but that only works if Trump is being punished for victimless crimes.
But he really doesn't like Trump. It's just that no one else is any better. 🙄
The 355 million dollar fine name me the victim
me. when you defraud the system, you defraud me.
lol loozen forever
Political witch hunt fantasy....
or the law, interpretated by those so authorized
losin
Yeah, but I still laugh at farts and dick jokes, so the literacy bar he has to get over for comedic value is fairly low.
I’m glad lozen has at least finally let the mask down and gone full ‘time to MAGA so you can skip my posts’ mode
Hey I ran red light , I drive drunk , I didn’t make my stop , but I didn’t kill anyone so there is no victim -> why do I have to pay a fine or even lose my driving licence?
Maga logic …
You broke a federal law that is what is different
If your argument is well the shareholders were defrauded because they could have charged a higher interest rate than the banks are as guilty as Trump .
This charge or penalty was political
It’s definitely not Biden
So freakin what ?
Trump is guilty and wait a second ….
Because it wouldn’t be a federal offense being a victim ,
Being state or municipal victim would makes it right ?
lol…..
But I like your style , so in your “world “ trying to fraud is all good as long there is no victim .
That’s great .
Ps: nope, u would need to prove the Banks made it on purpose and was implicated in the scheme .
In his attempt to argue prosecutorial misconduct, Trump's defense team cannot produce a precedent 'similarly situated' in the classified documents case. That's because there's nothing in our nation's history even remotely close to what Trump did.
And despite losin's protestations to the contrary, I'm sure it's the same in the NY cases(never before seen, unprecedented, etc).