The costs of trans visibility

Putting a punctuation mark on the neuro angle, anybody who is observing the landscape and believes the increase in trans identification has more to do with brain disposition than social influences is in serious denial. I don’t expect people to have the same insight into the mind I have, but this should be undeniable.

Why is this important? Because it puts the idea of gender affirmation into question. Trans affirmation becomes causative of gender dysphoria rather than strictly a form of treatment.

I’ll repeat myself, gender affirmation is a perverted treatment option for the crisis these young people are dealing with. Affirming a gender doesn’t solve suicidal ideation, feelings of not belonging, or nihilism. They need self affirmation followed by self development and self transformation.

Yes trans activists are causing the death and suffering of trans identifying minors and young adults more than any other group, that much is very clear.

If I mixed up Bryce and Crossnerd then I apologize

Why would a trans person represent the trans community more than someone who constantly spews anti-trans rhetoric?

Cmon bud

You don't get to say stuff like this without being called a marxist

Crossnerd is married and presumably heterosexual.

Yeah no one afaik who posts here is trans-- unless you want to believe that gender is a continuum in which case everyone is.

ye claiming Marxists cause the death and suffering of people is clearly a Marxist thing

I thought BLM was marxist?

Now trans activists are marxists?

I was more referencing how you make up stuff on the spot to further your own agenda

I had internalized a poster having "genital surgery" as a child as them being transitioned but I was wrong.

are sexes the same as gender? to me they are but i understand you have a different view on this issue so i ask.

so what do we call a dog with a penis as opposed to one with a vagina. is one male and one female?

this is just hard to grasp. race being a social construct is easier to grasp (not that i agree necessarily but i can see the viewpoint) but the sex of being a social construct is harder to understand because other animals dont dwell in our constructed society yet are binary.

when someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. this tendency is pronounced among minority rights activists, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. they are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities and about anything that is said concerning minorities.

How do you know that animals are binary? Have you asked them yourself?

we are not talking about homosexuality, which is something i can comprehend.

we are talking about genders. a male ape plowing another male ape may prove that homosexuality exists across the animal kingdom but doesn't change the fact that both apes have a penis. we call them males. we dont call them non binary because they are having sex, we call them homosexuals or bisexual or whatever.

It's not "objectively" mutilation in some Muslim countries. I was criticized last week for saying male circumcision should be banned as mutilation.

I don't think we typically classify animals as homosexual or bisexual because we have no way of communicating with the animal to confirm what its thoughts were at the time.

Point being, you have no clue if animals are binary, or trans, or whatever

Didn't we learn from Jurassic park that some frogs are sexually fluid?

You can have me on the record as saying many Muslim countries are backwater shitholes of humanitarian policies

If you google infibulation 3 of the top 4 results are for Female Genital Mutilation

yes both BLM and trans activism are cultural Marxism, with founders and relevant individuals in both movements being Marxists, and the ideas they use being developed by Marxists.

critical race theory is Marxist theory.

gender theory is Marxist theory.

I don't think this is even particularly controversial.

Judith Butler is one of the most important contributors to gender theory and she (as other tender theory advocates) got directly inspired by Simone de Beauvoir, the extremely famous and influential feminist marxist, lover of pedophile Jean Paul Sartre, a couple who famously campaigned to abolish the age of consent in France (yes they wanted sex with 8 years old to be legal, yes they signed a manifesto for that).

John Money literally invented the concept of gender as gender theory uses it now (as something wholly different from biological sex that exists independently from it).

His "greatest scientifial contribution" was operating genital surgery on a two years old boy (whose penis was damaged near birth because of a failed attempt to fix an health problem), creating an artificial vulva. that twin got renamed with a female name (Brenda). got estrogen as a minor. having a twin brother (who didn't get mutilated) was perfect for "science", as a control.

the brothers, when still minors (from preschool), were made perform sexual acts with Money then photographed.
the collected data was pseudo-anymously published and used to justify thousands of other sexual surgeries across the world.

later on the twins suicided.

it's all Marxists (and a lot of pedophiles) all the way.

that is the kind of humus gender theory came out from.

Pedophiles, Mengele-like doctors, Marxists

I can go on with many more examples if you want but you get the picture

well, if we were to observe a group of apes over a set period of time and ape A has intercourse with only females, we would call him heterosexual. if ape B has sex with only males, we would call him homosexual. if ape C has sex with both we would call him bisexual. these are terms we made up to differentiate between sexual behavior. we are not labeling these apes in order to hurt their feelings we are doing so because we need to in order to effectively communicate the differences between patterns of behavior.

if a man formulates a plan to kill another man and follows through with it, we call him a murderer. if he identifies as a ghandi like figure that doesn't matter one iota.

your quote is about homosexuality in other mammals and birds, not about trans-ness

And a woman.

There is a thread started by a trans person in the Card Rooms forum, and it has been active in the last few months; maybe you were remembering that.

to be fair trans activists today try to distance themselves from that literal monster, still he was pivotal in the development of gender theory.

and a theory can rarely escape it's founders ideology.

but the mutilations and the pedophiliac tendencies are just something that happened on top of the Marxism that underpinned the whole theory.

gender theory is simply something generated, created, by some of the worst people who ever lived (marxists, pedophiles, sadistic doctors).

one might argue that theoretically that doesn't diminish the truth value of a theory, but when a theory is based upon circular logic, with no way to refute (or prove) it, and it's been invented and developed and refined by some of the worst people who ever lived...

I didn't know that about Sartre.....Camus still ok?