Fringe conspiracy containment thread
2) I'm sure there were blockades to keep people from entering parts of front street so more people didn't die. I don't know specifically what happened beyond what Fish's (I've talked to Fish plenty, so next time I see him I'll ask him directly, it's a pretty chopped video) report in your video, but they obviously weren't intentionally blocking people in. 3) As far as barbed wire now, I'm sure there are still things to steal, but it's also
It's a proven fact that the cars were blocked from escaping, which is how a lot of people died. This doesn't only come from your friend Fish who was interviewed it comes from just about every survivor. There are countless interviews with people shocked as to why they were blocking the escape routes with no explanation why. And it's not just barbed wire, on HRE's video from yesterday, there are miles and miles of fence covered with a black tarp so no one can see in. They also used heavy yellow iron equipment to move large boulders on a lookout point on a mountain that overlooks the city so no one can park there anymore to look down on the valley. Since you know this guy Fish, why don't you ask him what they're hiding there and why our government (this operation is lead by FEMA, the national guard there who are blocking the road are answering to them only) is doing this
Our president who went there to visit compared this to a small kitchen fire in his house and joked that he almost lost his corvette. That was a stab in the back to everyone involved. It was a disgrace (as usual).
Since we're in the study game... I have two for you.
40% of deaths could have been prevented from Covid-19, if the Trump administration took the virus more seriously, didn't spread misinformation, and took better policy positions:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021...
Over 230k preventable covid-19 deaths in the US if people even had 1 covid-19 vaccine shot:
So all it takes for you to believe something is a website? See how easy it is to control people?
It's not hard to see what's going on, but just in case, cliffs: Biden is a front for the global nazies who are all hidden (in plain sight) behind klaus schwab and the WEF along with their cohorts over at the CDC, FBI, CIA, DOJ, FEMA and the UN who are doing this in plain sight, but everyone is too programmed to hate trump as much as possible (who's also a front fwiw, he's basically a nothing in this war it's not all about him either but he's definitely on humanities side) or too closed minded to ever think they're being lied to.
The fires that caused all the smoke in NYC all started at the exact same time over hundreds of miles of forrest in Canada. How on earth does that happen naturally? But everyone wants to turn a blind eye because they believe "of course no one would do that on purpose" which was probably so they can start their plans for climate lockdowns. I'm not a conspiracy theorist I'm just stating the facts that need to be answered of which everyone wants to turn a blind eye to.
They're also currently preparing for a new pandemic with a new variant. Also, FEMA just emailed the people involved in the Maui disaster to not post any pictures of the disaster on social media. What are they hiding?
Your president doesn't care at all about anybody he's supposed to be serving, because he's not serving us he's serving his masters who control him along with many other leaders of other countries. If they continue to get their way, you will all be living in a climate crisis where you won't be allowed to travel more than 15 minutes from your home and forced to eat bugs and artificially grown foods. Bon appetito.
This is a new one for me. The controlled demolition was nuclear?
Can someone explain like I'm five how this would work in any rational world?
There have always been fringe ideas about what exactly brought the towers down. I'm not too familiar with the nuclear idea but some sort of space-based-direct-energy has been floating around for quite some time. Sometimes perhaps the behind those ideas are earnest, and other times they're intentionally sowing disinformation.
What best matches the available evidence is that thermite was used to cut the center columns, and what exactly caused the outward and lateral ejection of the exterior of the buildings has always been a bit of a mystery.
luckbox, how many people would need to be involved in a 9/11 inside job
bare minimum
we're not talking the "it only takes one guy to place the thermite" we're going full scope here and how many people would have to be involved in some manner
luckbox, how many people would need to be involved in a 9/11 inside job
bare minimum
we're not talking the "it only takes one guy to place the thermite" we're going full scope here and how many people would have to be involved in some manner
Well involved in some manner, I would think quite a lot...hundreds.
People who knew the full scope, probably quite a bit less.
It’s more believable hundreds/thousands of people are keeping still to this day this huge secrets with amazing coordinations and no flaws on succeeding this plan and deceiving the entire planet , news , witness on the grounds ,etc.
instead of simply planes cranking in ?
And what was the goal/rewards in the end of simulating planes crashing ?
Any ideas ?
It’s more believable hundreds/thousands of people are keeping still to this day this huge secrets with amazing coordinations and no flaws on succeeding this plan and deceiving the entire planet , news , witness on the grounds ,etc.
instead of simply planes cranking in ?
And what was the goal/rewards in the end of simulating planes crashing ?
Any ideas ?
What's more believable? That a bunch of people could keep a secret or that circumstances would come together such it would look like a bunch of people are keeping a secret dispute them not actually doing so? I'll always choose the latter there.
"Simulating planes crashing" hasn't been a part of the discussion as far as why goes if you don't already have some ideas there then this discussion isn't for you.
Nucular. It's called nucular.
What's more believable? That a bunch of people could keep a secret or that circumstances would come together such it would look like a bunch of people are keeping a secret dispute them not actually doing so? I'll always choose the latter there.
"Simulating planes crashing" hasn't been a part of the discussion as far as why goes if you don't already have some ideas there then this discussion isn't for you.
u didn’t address any of the points , it’s ok.
The day u will maybe it will open your eyes …
Ps: people on the ground saw planes crashing too….
Since I don’t understand **** of what u said it’s probably over my head .
Your right !
Ps: u never addressed the motives of it all ….
Usually crimes have a motive .
If you can't think of motives for 9/11 then you're not here in good faith.
Either that or you're so helpless that discussing any of this further with you is pointless.
I see .
So no motives, who would personally benefits from it , etc .
Ok thx .
Ps: stay in your echo chamber.
I see .
So no motives, who would personally benefits from it , etc .
Ok thx .
Ps: stay in your echo chamber.
No that's not what I said.
There are motives that are so glaringly obvious that if you can't come up with some on your own then discussing this further is pointless.
Can you really not think of any?
There have always been fringe ideas about what exactly brought the towers down. I'm not too familiar with the nuclear idea but some sort of space-based-direct-energy has been floating around for quite some time. Sometimes perhaps the behind those ideas are earnest, and other times they're intentionally sowing disinformation.
What best matches the available evidence is that thermite was used to cut the center columns, and what exactly caused
If anything at all, biulding 7 was brought down in a controlled demolition and it was a block away across the street. It never got hit with a plane, but some "debris" from the towers fell through the windows. This was an absolute controlled demolition you don't even need to be too smart to see that.
https://rumble.com/v13awvm-911-wtc-7-col...
With respect to the main towers, they were literally melted and turned into a fine powder in front of everyone's eyes (where did all the debris go?). Judy Wood has a video called "where did the towers go" which includes evidence of advanced secretive weapons being used.
Here is the evidence, as laid out by Dr. Wood
If anything at all, biulding 7 was brought down in a controlled demolition and it was a block away across the street. It never got hit with a plane, but some "debris" from the towers fell through the windows. This was an absolute controlled demolition you don't even need to be too smart to see that.
https://rumble.com/v13awvm-911-wtc-7-col...
With respect to the main towers, they were literally melte
I'm just the kind of person that never believes anything unless I can see or prove it for myself.
Submitted without comment.
No that's not what I said.
There are motives that are so glaringly obvious that if you can't come up with some on your own then discussing this further is pointless.
Can you really not think of any?
Not really .
If it was some kind of cia plans or w.e Americans entities that did it for some obscure goals , I just don’t see any success in it presently AND I don’t believe they needed to make so much damages and Americans death to reach their goals.
They were able almost doing everything they wanted to do already without that kind of 9/11 event for decades .
So what gigantic goals needed that kind of terrorist attack by domestic entities they couldn’t do previously ?
I have no idea ….
I mean u do believe they succeeded right since most believe the main narrative that it was a foreign attack by planes ?
So what did they win ?
Not really .
If it was some kind of cia plans or w.e Americans entities that did it for some obscure goals , I just don’t see any success in it presently AND I don’t believe they needed to make so much damages and Americans death to reach their goals.
They were able almost doing everything they wanted to do already without that kind of 9/11 event for decades .
So what gigantic goals needed that kind of terrorist attack by domestic entities the
Is it your opinion that they could have had a war on terror and invaded both Afghanistan and Iraq without 9/11?
Is it your opinion that they could have had a war on terror and invaded both Afghanistan and Iraq without 9/11?
Yes they lied with WMDs anyway and they used it to go in ….
And what gains they have in Afghanistan?
Start a war to sell weapons for the industrial military complex ?
They did that kind of strategy ( directly or indirectly) for decades already.
I don’t see why this time they would need to kill 3k Americans this time for bs talibans …..
Yes they lied with WMDs anyway and they used it to go in ….
And what gains they have in Afghanistan?
Start a war to sell weapons for the industrial military complex ?
They did that kind of strategy ( directly or indirectly) for decades already.
I don’t see why this time they would need to kill 3k Americans this time for bs talibans …..
You're wrong. Prior to the 1993 gulf war, the US hadn't been involved in a major conflict since Vietnam, and that needed a fake attack to sell it to the American public.
You're wrong. Prior to the 1993 gulf war, the US hadn't been involved in a major conflict since Vietnam, and that needed a fake attack to sell it to the American public.
I think the definition of "war" has evolved with the expansion of the presidential war power. Is it true we had no congressionally declared wars after Korea? Yes, but we were involved in the military use of force for extended time that would qualify as "major conflict" at least a half dozen times, including in Vietnam. I don't know that war was declared in the Gulf given its duration.
It also looks like the UN declares certain conflicts as wars as a practical manner.
No that's not what I said.
There are motives that are so glaringly obvious that if you can't come up with some on your own then discussing this further is pointless.
Can you really not think of any?
9/11 was def beneficial for people like Bush, Biden, Hillary, etc. They got their wars, the patriot act/mass surveillance, etc.
Basically they gained a lot of power and got to loot trillions from the public.
Doesn't mean they did it though. It was just a stroke of good fortune that they took advantage of.
Seems to be a big theme in conspiracy thought that if a person takes advantage of something, they must have orchestrated it.
