Moderation Questions and General Chat Thread

Moderation Questions and General Chat Thread

The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic failed, and it became a general discussion thread with almost no moderation related posts at all. And those that were posted were so buried in non-mod posts that it became a huge time drain on the mods to sort through them. Then, when off topic posts were deleted posters complained about that.

This led to the closing of the mod discussion thread, replaced by the post report/pm approach. This has filtered out lots of noise, but has resulted at times in the General Discussion Thread turning into a quasi-mod thread. This is not desirable, but going back to the old mod thread is also not a workable option.

Therefore, I have created this new moderation thread, but with a different purpose and ground rules than previous mod threads. The purpose of this thread is to provide a place for posters to pose questions to the mods about how policies are applied; to bring to the mods attention posts they think are inappropriate and reach the level of requiring mod action; and for mods to communicate to posters things like changes or clarifications to policies, bannings, etc.

Now let me tell you what this thread is NOT a place for. It is not for nonmoderation related posts, even if the discussion originates from a comment in in a mod related post. It is not for posters to post their opinions about other posters or whether a poster should be banned. It is not to rehash past grievances about mod decisions from months or years ago. The focus of this thread will be recent posts that require action now. Or questions about current policies and enforcement.

So basically, this is a thread to ask mods questions. Which means, pretty much that only mods should be answering those questions. If a poster asks why a particular post was deleted or allowed, only a mod can answer that. Everyone else who wants to jump in with their opinion or their mod war story needs to stay out of it. It just increases the noise to signal ratio and does nothing to answer the question.

Everyone needs to understand that this thread has very different rules than the old mod thread and any other thread. Any non-moderation post will be deleted on sight. Not moved to the appropriate thread, just deleted. So don't waste your time crafting a masterpiece post about wars or transgender issues or the presidential election and then post it in this thread. It will be gone. Also, this isnt a thread for general commentary about our mods performance. Posting "browser sucks as a mod" or any such posts that don't actually ask about a policy or request a mod action will be deleted. Everyone is entitled to their opinion about the moderation of this forum. But this thread isnt for complaining about mods. You are free to go to the ATF forum and make your concerns about modding in this forum there.

So with that intro, this thread is open for those who need to bring questions about mod policies or bring inappropriate posts to the mods attention. Again, it is NOT a thread for group discussions about other posters or for other posters to answer questions directed to mods.

We'll see how this goes. If you have what you feel is an open issue raised in the General Discussion Thread, please copy that post or otherwise reintroduce the issue here.

Thanks.

30 January 2024 at 05:27 AM
Reply...

6491 Replies

i
a

how can we prove it's really luckbox and not your CIA supplied body double?


we all know the real luckbox is at the bottom of that lake, rip


by rickroll P

how can we prove it's really luckbox and not your CIA supplied body double?


we all know the real luckbox is at the bottom of that lake, rip

I know things only the real lockbox would know, obviously.


Prove it. Where's Hoffa's body?


by d2_e4 P

Prove it. Where's Hoffa's body?

The real luckbox wasn't born when Hoffa was (allegedly) killed.


by Luckbox Inc P

The real luckbox wasn't born when Hoffa was (allegedly) killed.

He wasn't born when man (allegedly) walked on the moon either, yet he seems to know all about how that hoax was perpetrated.


by d2_e4 P

He wasn't born when man (allegedly) walked on the moon either, yet he seems to know all about how that hoax was perpetrated.

Some hoaxes are easier than others.


if joe rogan can repent, then so can you luckbox


by d2_e4 P

He wasn't born when man (allegedly) walked on the moon either, yet he seems to know all about how that hoax was perpetrated.

Look. As everyone knows, they did hire Stanley Kubrick to fake the moon landings, but he couldn't get the effects he wanted in the studio, so they had to shoot on location.


by rickroll P

if joe rogan can repent, then so can you luckbox

Joe Rogan-- the Hollywood actor famous for his role on Newsradio?


by Luckbox Inc P

Joe Rogan-- the Hollywood actor famous for his role on Newsradio?

you think they got to him and he's now compromised or is he now a body double like you?


by rickroll P

you think they got to him and he's now compromised or is he now a body double like you?

I think they've had him the whole time.


who do they not have, who can be trusted?


Getting back to the actual topic....south Florida is super nice. I've been flying in and out of Fort Lauderdale a bunch but all of the layovers have been overnight ones where I either got a hotel and just slept and or slept in the airport, so this is my first time actually being here in the daytime and doing stuff since I was 15.


by 57 On Red P

Look. As everyone knows, they did hire Stanley Kubrick to fake the moon landings, but he couldn't get the effects he wanted in the studio, so they had to shoot on location.

He (allegedly) alluded to it in The Shining. 😀
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_237

Another theorist believed that Kubrick had directed the footage disseminated by NASA to fake the Apollo 11 Moon landing. He believed that there are telltale signs of the use of front projection in NASA's footage and that Kubrick was contracted to produce hoaxed footage of a fake Moon landing. He points to the knitted Apollo 11 sweater that Danny wears and claims that "237" refers to the mean distance of the Earth to the Moon. He also refers to the fact that a carpet pattern resembles the Apollo launching pad as evidence that the film is an elaborate apology of sorts for Kubrick's involvement. The analyst feels that the tirade Jack delivers to Wendy about how she does not understand the duty of work and honoring a contract with an employer portrays Kubrick's own sense of isolation from keeping so big a secret.


who banned lucium lol?


There should be a hard 50 post per day limit.


Let's make it 15.


by Trolly McTrollson P

There should be a hard 50 post per day limit.

by Bluegrassplayer P

Let's make it 15.

in general, liberals just hate freedom. case in point.


by Victor P

who banned lucium lol?

Not me. Videopro according to the user notes. I don't know who that is but his name is blue.


by Victor P

in general, liberals just hate freedom. case in point.

Let's make it 5 for certain posters.


by Rococo P

Not me. Videopro according to the user notes. I don't know who that is but his name is blue.

What does blue signify again?

And again, why isn't there a reference page somewhere explaining what the colors mean?


by chillrob P

What does blue signify again?

And again, why isn't there a reference page somewhere explaining what the colors mean?

VideoPro used to post as ProfessionalPoker. I think he used to work for 2+2 in some capacity. Blue means administrator.

Surprised Luciom caught a ban, he's such an reasonable, agreeable guy.



by d2_e4 P

VideoPro used to post as ProfessionalPoker. I think he used to work for 2+2 in some capacity. Blue means administrator.

Surprised Luciom caught a ban, he's such an reasonable, agreeable guy.

I wonder what it was over, haven't seen any announcement or specific post of Luciom's explaining the ban.


It probably wasn't in politics
It says tempban
It will solve itself shortly Nancy Drew


Reply...