Moderation Questions and General Chat Thread

Moderation Questions and General Chat Thread

The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic failed, and it became a general discussion thread with almost no moderation related posts at all. And those that were posted were so buried in non-mod posts that it became a huge time drain on the mods to sort through them. Then, when off topic posts were deleted posters complained about that.

This led to the closing of the mod discussion thread, replaced by the post report/pm approach. This has filtered out lots of noise, but has resulted at times in the General Discussion Thread turning into a quasi-mod thread. This is not desirable, but going back to the old mod thread is also not a workable option.

Therefore, I have created this new moderation thread, but with a different purpose and ground rules than previous mod threads. The purpose of this thread is to provide a place for posters to pose questions to the mods about how policies are applied; to bring to the mods attention posts they think are inappropriate and reach the level of requiring mod action; and for mods to communicate to posters things like changes or clarifications to policies, bannings, etc.

Now let me tell you what this thread is NOT a place for. It is not for nonmoderation related posts, even if the discussion originates from a comment in in a mod related post. It is not for posters to post their opinions about other posters or whether a poster should be banned. It is not to rehash past grievances about mod decisions from months or years ago. The focus of this thread will be recent posts that require action now. Or questions about current policies and enforcement.

So basically, this is a thread to ask mods questions. Which means, pretty much that only mods should be answering those questions. If a poster asks why a particular post was deleted or allowed, only a mod can answer that. Everyone else who wants to jump in with their opinion or their mod war story needs to stay out of it. It just increases the noise to signal ratio and does nothing to answer the question.

Everyone needs to understand that this thread has very different rules than the old mod thread and any other thread. Any non-moderation post will be deleted on sight. Not moved to the appropriate thread, just deleted. So don't waste your time crafting a masterpiece post about wars or transgender issues or the presidential election and then post it in this thread. It will be gone. Also, this isnt a thread for general commentary about our mods performance. Posting "browser sucks as a mod" or any such posts that don't actually ask about a policy or request a mod action will be deleted. Everyone is entitled to their opinion about the moderation of this forum. But this thread isnt for complaining about mods. You are free to go to the ATF forum and make your concerns about modding in this forum there.

So with that intro, this thread is open for those who need to bring questions about mod policies or bring inappropriate posts to the mods attention. Again, it is NOT a thread for group discussions about other posters or for other posters to answer questions directed to mods.

We'll see how this goes. If you have what you feel is an open issue raised in the General Discussion Thread, please copy that post or otherwise reintroduce the issue here.

Thanks.

30 January 2024 at 05:27 AM
Reply...

6491 Replies

i
a

This is very boring too. We already did all this before, PW got to give any definition he wanted, and most people still thought that the current conflict didn't fit the definition.

The important qualification is 'intent', and no one can know that because no one is a mind reader.


Can't you people keep your insanity in the IP thread, where it belongs? Do we really need this nonsense spreading to the rest of the forum?


At least is serves as a relatable experience to how conflicts escalate and spread.


by chillrob P

Why have the word / concept of extermination if it has never happened?

Eh? We have words for a lot of things that have never happened and will never happen.


by d2_e4 P

Eh? We have words for a lot of things that have never happened and will never happen.

Exterminations have definitely happened. Prior to Islam, there were over 10 Jewish tribes in Saudi Arabia. Over time they were completely exterminated by every reasonable definition of the word, with the most notable being the Banu Qurayza, who were executed to the man after surrendering to the early Muslims in 627 AD.


by Dunyain P

Exterminations have definitely happened. Prior to Islam, there were over 10 Jewish tribes in Saudi Arabia. Over time they were completely exterminated by every reasonable definition of the word, with the most notable being the Banu Qurayza, who were executed to the man after surrendering to the early Muslims in 627 AD.

I just found the suggestion that words should only exist if they describe things that exist to be rather odd.


by PointlessWords P

The Israelis aren’t going to kill all the Palestinians either, that’s why it’s not an extermination


Guess what it is tho

A genocide

Do Israel kills every Palestinian in sight not distinguish between , kids, woman , elderly , unarmed and terrorist systematically?

Genocide is just the extermination of a specific group .


Pw likes to ignore the word intent


by metsandfinsfan P

Pw likes to ignore the word intent

IDF has already said their intent was to end Palestinians.

This has been quoted for you many times.


You ignore the truth.


by jalfrezi P

So it’s ok to tel a poster they support terrorists despite them posting many times that they don’t, but not ok to tell a poster they support genocide? I honestly don’t get it.

same thing was happening with me in another thread

one poster was making baseless accusations of me, refused to show their work, so i made it abundantly clear that i would just start calling that person a rapist

obviously gangsta had zero issue with the original offender and their baseless insults of me calling me a racist, but my response, which was clearly a joke as a response caught me a ban whereas the other person wasn't even told to stop

terrible decision by gangsta because it rewards the original behavior and ensures that they will continue the baseless insults


I was just told "you guys" when referring to the idf and he was given a warning not a timeout. Don't act like you and other non Israel supporters are being held to a higher standard than Israel supporters are. Because if you look at the timeouts and who gets them, you will see you are definitely not correct


by metsandfinsfan P

I was just told "you guys" when referring to the idf and he was given a warning not a timeout. Don't act like you and other non Israel supporters are being held to a higher standard than Israel supporters are. Because if you look at the timeouts and who gets them, you will see you are definitely not correct

Bro I can’t tell if you are lying or misremembering.


I said you guys when referring to you guys who support Israel/ the IDF

Do you need me to quote it for you?

Do you want to be held to a lower standard?


by rickroll P

same thing was happening with me in another thread

one poster was making baseless accusations of me, refused to show their work, so i made it abundantly clear that i would just start calling that person a rapist

obviously gangsta had zero issue with the original offender and their baseless insults of me calling me a racist, but my response, which was clearly a joke as a response caught me a ban whereas the other person wasn't even told to sto

Some baseless insults are worse than others.


Let’s go to the instant replay, Al.


by rickroll P

same thing was happening with me in another thread

one poster was making baseless accusations of me, refused to show their work, so i made it abundantly clear that i would just start calling that person a rapist

obviously gangsta had zero issue with the original offender and their baseless insults of me calling me a racist, but my response, which was clearly a joke as a response caught me a ban whereas the other person wasn't even told to sto

I don't expect you to be convinced, but here's my explanation:

1) I think being called a rapist is worse than being called a racist.

2) You made a post about race (which I thought was fine and appropriate):

by rickroll P

look at it this way, are you racist if turn down a sexual advance from someone of another race?

And he responded with this:

by L0LWAT P

I don't think you are fascist, but probably racist based on your random rants.

Which isn't the same as just calling him a rapist baselessly.

3) He only continued to explain himself when you pushed back:

by L0LWAT P

It really came out of left field and you seem interested in the subject. Does this prove your racist? No. Does it indicate how you think about race? Yes. You sound like a grumpy old redneck using slightly better words to be racist.

On the other hand, you called him a rapist out of nowhere multiple times. I told you to stop. You continued anyway, which is what got you the 1-day ban.


by metsandfinsfan P

Because if you look at the timeouts and who gets them, you will see you are definitely not correct

Do you have stats on this or is it just based on your big feelings?

There are a handful of serial offenders in that thread who struggle with following the rules, you chief among them. That seems to be a personality issue, not a politics issue. For instance, Victor has been very cooperative and has made a sincere effort to comply with the rules of that thread since I took over I/P despite what many consider to be espousing radical views. Maybe you should try that. Or just go back to using AI. The bot seemed to understand the no personal attacks rule fairly well.


by rickroll P

one poster was making baseless accusations of me, refused to show their work, so i made it abundantly clear that i would just start calling that person a rapist

That seems like a mistake on your part.


by Crossnerd P

Or just go back to using AI. The bot seemed to understand the no personal attacks rule fairly well.

Lol if true.


by metsandfinsfan P

I was just told "you guys" when referring to the idf and he was given a warning not a timeout. Don't act like you and other non Israel supporters are being held to a higher standard than Israel supporters are. Because if you look at the timeouts and who gets them, you will see you are definitely not correct

So explain how one side will get a day's forumwide ban for calling a poster a genocide-enthusiast but the other (cough) is free to call them terrorist supporters?


by Crossnerd P

Do you have stats on this or is it just based on your big feelings?

There are a handful of serial offenders in that thread who struggle with following the rules, you chief among them. That seems to be a personality issue, not a politics issue. For instance, Victor has been very cooperative and has made a sincere effort to comply with the rules of that thread since I took over I/P despite what many consider to be espousing radical views. Mayb

Victor posted that or isn't possible for Israel to show compassion and you were fine with it but not my reply


Victor is infuriated that anyone could believe that isreal could treat anyone with compassion and no issue

But


No issue with Victor but my post isn't okay

You really see no bias there? Alright then

Regarding my posts to trolly:
I'm not surprised I got a timeout for replying to trollys attacks but i sincerely doubt trolly would have gotten his if I didn't reply the way I did

He constantly makes posts like that that you excuse as sarcasm

Please try not to delete this post like you did the last time I tried to discuss issues in the mod thread


by jalfrezi P

So explain how one side will get a day's forumwide ban for calling a poster a genocide-enthusiast but the other (cough) is free to call them terrorist supporters?

We've been over this. Someone called you a "rape denier", you responded in kind and called them a "genocide enthusiast". Both parties had seen many warnings about that exact thing and knew not to do it. Both parties ate a 24 hr ban.

I have repeatedly warned the thread not to characterize one another or the thread at large, and continue on a daily basis to have to moderate that exact issue. If someone calls you a "terrorist supporter", feel free to report the post and it will be moderated. I'm not going to backdate any moderation based on this discussion.


by d2_e4 P

Lol if true.

Completely true. I put them through samsung ai and either used professional edit or polite edit depending on the post.

I would use it on every post but

Spoiler
Show

The ai won't work when it has words like genocide in it

I did try


by metsandfinsfan P

Victor posted that or isn't possible for Israel to show compassion and you were fine with it but not my reply


Victor is infuriated that anyone could believe that isreal could treat anyone with compassion and no issue

But


No issue with Victor but my post isn't okay

You really see no bias there? Alright then

Regarding my posts to trolly:
I'm not surprised I got a timeout for replying to trollys attacks but i sincerely doubt trolly would have

I'm not going to do this with you for very long so I'll address this once and then its done.

Victor is allowed to have the above opinion regarding the treatment of the local population by the Israeli government, which was the context of that conversation, and didn't direct it toward anyone specifically. Your response with the "Israelis" in quotes was very clearly implying Victor is an antisemite and his opinion is actually pertaining to Jews, which is not what he said, and your characterization of it is not allowed. Its in the OP of the thread specifically, you personally have been warned for it before, and you either know better and did it anyway or still have some learning to do.

If you had only made the one post about another poster in the thread today that may have been one thing, but as usual there are multiple problematic posts you have aimed toward others. Maybe it would have been more fair to give you another 24 hours since you just came off a timeout for this exact issue, but I've been trying to keep it light where possible. So you're welcome. Try not to be a problem in this thread now instead.


by metsandfinsfan P

Completely true. I put them through samsung ai and either used professional edit or polite edit depending on the post.

I would use it on every post but

Spoiler
Show

The ai won't work when it has words like genocide in it

I did try

Maye you should attempt your own professional and polite edits. You had no issues when you were using the bot. It might be a good instructional tool.


by Crossnerd P

Maye you should attempt your own professional and polite edits. You had no issues when you were using the bot. It might be a good instructional tool.

Mets without the Metsiness is worse than fake crab.


Reply...