Who Shot dJRt

Who Shot dJRt


13 July 2024 at 10:40 PM
Reply...

1393 Replies

i
a

lolllllllll imagine spending your life training to be an SS agent, putting your body between Trump and a shooter, and still having MAGA derpers **** all over you.


by Trolly McTrollson P

lolllllllll imagine spending your life training to be an SS agent, putting your body between Trump and a shooter, and still having MAGA derpers **** all over you.

I think they're complaining that she didn't do that?


by d2_e4 P

I don't hate Trump for "self serving actions", I hate him for a bunch of other stuff I've explained to you a thousand times already.

Seems disingenuous.
You are against Trump because he tried to subvert the 2020 election to stay in power.
You are against Trump because you fear 250 years of precedence will be uprooted by him so he can stay in power in 2029.

Him staying in power = self-serving.

But democracy is on the line!

Meanwhile, you support a Secret Service agent ducking for cover, for self-serving reasons, failing to do her job, and exposing the #1 2024 election contender to death. That's very undemocratic.

Just trying to reconcile your positions.

The best conclusion one can draw is, anything that lowers Trump's chance of election is good, anything that increases it is bad. The rest is all noise.


by Trolly McTrollson P

lolllllllll imagine spending your life training to be an SS agent, putting your body between Trump and a shooter, and still having MAGA derpers **** all over you.

Do you think that person spent her whole life training to be an SS agent? If so she never learned how to holster a weapon or do her job. I don't think she had much training at all, but could be wrong.


You're clutching at straws there. I'm sure even you can do better than "what hypocrisy, if you approve of the SS agent not taking a bullet for Trump then you should support his bid for dictatorship coz reasons".


by d2_e4 P

I think they're complaining that she didn't do that?

There's complaining because she's a woman, and no amount of dedication to serving Trump can ever overcome that.


by housenuts P


Just trying to reconcile your positions.

you should worry about reconciling your own position of not minding that nutjobs have taken over your party


He hasn't got any defense of his own positions other than "crypto and lols", so his raison d'etre here appears to be to police when others are being hypocritical or contradictory, which could sort of work, if he weren't so terrible at it. I mean, just look at all the hypocrisy brought to light here!

by housenuts P


You are against Trump because he tried to subvert the 2020 election to stay in power.
You are against Trump because you fear 250 years of precedence will be uprooted by him so he can stay in power in 2029.
Meanwhile, you support a Secret Service agent ducking for cover, for self-serving reasons, failing to do her job, and exposing the #1 2024 election contender to death. That's very undemocratic.


by Trolly McTrollson P

There's complaining because she's a woman, and no amount of dedication to serving Trump can ever overcome that.

Could care less if she's a woman or a man. I'm all for women serving if they can do the job. I knew a few bad ass women infantry soldiers but they were few and far between. Lots of terrible male soldiers as well.

It's pretty clear this individual is in no way cut out for the role.


The blanket of failure is so wide that singling out the woman almost feels... bigoted


by coordi P

The blanket of failure is so wide that singling out the woman almost feels... pointed

100% agree there was a massive blanket failure and more heads need to roll. the local law enforcement by the building was a massive disaster. the overall security plan was a massive disaster. unfortunately for both of those we only have reports. i'm hopeful the powers that be will do what's necessary to rectify and improve.

for this particular instance, we have multiple photos and videos of pure incompetence, which is what makes singling out this individual something the average person is able to do. as more information/photos/videos arise, i'm sure others can be identified as utterly incompetent as well.


Who even says "lady SS agent" in 2024, like how old are you people?


by Trolly McTrollson P

Who even says "lady SS agent" in 2024, like how old are you people?

I agree. We should ask how they identify before we assume they're a lady


by housenuts P

100% agree there was a massive blanket failure and more heads need to roll. the local law enforcement by the building was a massive disaster. the overall security plan was a massive disaster. unfortunately for both of those we only have reports. i'm hopeful the powers that be will do what's necessary to rectify and improve.

for this particular instance, we have multiple photos and videos of pure incompetence, which is what makes singling ou

I know all the gravy seals will come out the woodwork to talk about how brave and manly they'd be if only they weren't incel shutins

The LARPs will certainly be strong


by Trolly McTrollson P

Who even says "lady SS agent" in 2024, like how old are you people?

According to right wing Twitter the proper terminology is DEI SS agent


Is this "DEI" or "woke" or is it "critical race theory?" I can't keep up with the ever-shifting lexicon of soft bigotry our conservative friends invent.


it was usually used for non-white people but this is the first time it got aimed at a white women.


The Secret Service Director said it herself.

"I'm very conscious as I sit in this chair now, of making sure that we need to attract diverse candidates and ensure that we are developing and giving opportunities to everybody in our workforce, and particularly women," Cheatle said.

Rather than hiring the best candidates for the job, she wants to hire a diverse work force. Reap what you sow I guess.


by housenuts P

The Secret Service Director said it herself.

"I'm very conscious as I sit in this chair now, of making sure that we need to attract diverse candidates and ensure that we are developing and giving opportunities to everybody in our workforce, and particularly women," Cheatle said.

Rather than hiring the best candidates for the job, she wants to hire a diverse work force. Reap what you sow I guess.

For all you know she was top of her class in "throwing body in front of president" and "holstering weapon under duress"

Thats kind of the point of calling all this bigotry, but I wouldn't expect you guys to understand the nuance there


DEI is bigotry. rather than hiring the best person for the job, they hire people to satisfy a predefined quota.


by housenuts P

DEI is bigotry. rather than hiring the best person for the job, they hire people to satisfy a predefined quota.

You are assuming it was DEI because you want to think less of the woman and I am pointing out that you are just making wild biased assumptions so that you can fit this assumed image in your mind and that is quite literally bigotry.

I've done this veil and mirror lifting multiple times in the trans thread and its always met with violent rejection, so not expecting much here but holding out hope.


the idea that there is a singular "best" person for a job is so dumb.


by coordi P

You are assuming it was DEI because you want to think less of the woman and I am pointing out that you are just making wild biased assumptions so that you can fit this assumed image in your mind and that is quite literally bigotry.

I've done this veil and mirror lifting multiple times in the trans thread and its always met with violent rejection, so not expecting much here but holding out hope.

I mean they publicly stated bigotry in their hiring process.

Your statement above that perhaps she was the best candidate. I mean yes this is possible, just extremely unlikely. Maybe she just had a bad day, like Biden had a bad night on debate night.

If that was the best, then sadly there are bigger problems.

18:11:33: Shots are fired.

18.11:34: Trump touches the right side of his face.

18:11:35: Trump takes cover as agents rush to the podium.

Male agent 1: “Get down, get down, get down.”

More shots heard as Trump surrounded by agents.

18:11:41: Female agent: “What’re we doing, what’re we doing.” “Where are we going…”

Man indistinctly yelling.

18:11.50: Gunshot, then woman screams.

18:11:58: Male agent 2: “Go around to the spare, go around to the spare.”

18:12:00: Male agent 3 says something like: “Move to the spare, hold, hold, when you’re ready, on you.”


by housenuts P

I agree. We should ask how they identify before we assume they're a lady

Oh snap, we got some classic Boomer Facebook comedy here.


by Slighted P

the idea that there is a singular "best" person for a job is so dumb.

Seems pretty logical to me.

You take all of the people, and they're going to form a continuum of sorts. And at the ends there are going to be outliers. And amongst those outliers you can start doing some fine grained analysis and ultimately you'll find the best.


Reply...