Who Shot dJRt

Who Shot dJRt


13 July 2024 at 10:40 PM
Reply...

1393 Replies

i
a

by mongidig P

If you were assigned a Secret Service person for your protection would you want them to be a 5'2" female or a 6'0" male?

If a couple guy's were threatening you with violence would you prefer a couple female police or a couple male police showed up?

I have a good friend who worked for USSS. The **** he routinely packed in a small briefcase is evidence to not care about what USSS agents are equipped with behind their pants' zipper.


by d2_e4 P

Dude, I think you're missing the point. If the sentence is about replacing men with women, it's going to sound stupid to him. Might fix the flawed grammar and flawed thinking in one fell swoop.

You have more confidence than I do about how it will sound.

That is my only point. I think we're on the same page, but your optimism is way ahead of mine!


by Rococo P

I don't understand. Are you now arguing that women should not be allowed to be police officers?

As for SS, I wouldn't care so long as both people were qualified.

Every person should have the opportunity for a position. Not everyone is qualified for that position.


damn how did i miss the post about calling trump smart.. lol. that just gives away the game.


skinny, holding a pole (obviously gay) and looks like he's afraid of drowning



this guy fs



by d2_e4 P

Hey bro, this you?


I have no clue what this is trying to say.


by rickroll P

skinny, holding a pole (obviously gay)

Poor O'Bummer, hope he can pray teh gay away.


by mongidig P

I have no clue what this is trying to say.

I think we might be in danger of losing count of the things you have no clue about.


by BGnight P

For what? Both those things I stated are scientific facts. Women also cannot be men. Try to ban me for that.

All the guys on here defending women S.S. are the same guys that cuck for feminists and are fine with letting their girlfriends hang out with their ex's.

In fairness to you and as a warning, if you continue too much further along this path, I probably will ban you.

Edit- I should have kept reading. BGnight will be taking a week off for his cumulative performance today, which included but was not limited to misogynistic posts and bigotry against the lgbtq community.


by Crossnerd P

In fairness to you and as a warning, if you continue too much further along this path, I probably will ban you.

Edit- I should have kept reading. BGnight will be taking a week off for his cumulative performance today, which included but was not limited to misogynistic posts and bigotry against the lgbtq community.

You probably made him vote Trump now.


by d2_e4 P

I think we might be in danger of losing count of the things you have no clue about.

I don't have an issue with an occasional one of these guys, but there's just so damn many of them.


by biggerboat P

I don't have an issue with an occasional one of these guys, but there's just so damn many of them.

Unfortunately, their rise in numbers seems representative of general public sentiment. He's just a run of the mill religious nut with nothing new to bring to the table though, good riddance. I'll take "crypto and lols" bro over that dipshit any day. Oh, there you are horsenut, didn't see you there.


by Crossnerd P

In fairness to you and as a warning, if you continue too much further along this path, I probably will ban you.

Edit- I should have kept reading. BGnight will be taking a week off for his cumulative performance today, which included but was not limited to misogynistic posts and bigotry against the lgbtq community.

I think you're too emotional for this job.


That was a joke. Can't figure spoilers on my phone.


Briefing -- the FBI director, his deputy director and the head of the Secret Service -- told lawmakers Crooks was identified as a person of interest a full 62 minutes before the shooting took place.

According to the sources, the timeline presented in the briefing was as follows:

5:10 p.m. Crooks was first identified as a person of interest

5:30 Crooks was spotted with a rangefinder

5:52 Crooks was spotted on the roof by Secret Service

6:02 Trump takes the stage

6:12 Crooks fires first shots


...men...women...idiots. take your pick.


jfc that's insane


I'm no expert, but "spotting a person of interest on the roof with a rangefinder" would have been making my spidey senses tingle.


That's my tax dollars at work :(


"Folks, secret service HQ are not sending their best, they're really not sending their best."

Props to whoever assigned Trump that SS detail. Good effort, unlucky.


by d2_e4 P

I'm no expert, but "spotting a person of interest on the roof with a rangefinder" would have been making my spidey senses tingle.

Careful. Just as a precaution maybe read some NYT and Wapo.


by Victor P

Careful. Just as a precaution maybe read some NYT and Wapo.

?


Well played. Don't think about it too much.


Wtf are you talking about?


Nothing to see here folks


by d2_e4 P

?

he's saying that at any event like this there could be many "persons of interest"

it just means someone noticed him and said "that's someone to keep an eye on"


but seeing him crawl on the roof should have led to an immediate reaction, seeing him using a range finder is time to just open fire


Reply...