Who Shot dJRt

Who Shot dJRt


13 July 2024 at 10:40 PM
Reply...

1393 Replies

i
a

by BGnight P

Wait...who were the Jan 6 victims? AOC?? Only person killed was a defenseless female veteran. Looooooool. Funny how leftist "mostly peaceful" protests don't traumatize anyone, but waving people into the Capitol and taking pictures with them is a mental health crisis.

I'm not sure, ask montrealcrops

The final cost of the Capitol riot could exceed $30 million, taking into account the cost of mental health counseling for riot victims and other more indirect costs incurred by rioters, Brett Blanton, the architect of the Capitol, told Congress in February 2021.

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...


It was either staged by Trump with real bullets and real people dying or it was a deep state hit and he was just lucky as ****. Everyone in shooting circles says what a slam dunk that shot that was by even a very mediocre shooter. I for one am on the fence.

Most logical explanation is Crooks was a patsy (MKUltra or not hard to say) and was nudged into doing it by spooks and thus security was lax as a result of it being planned by higher ups. Crooks probably wasn't a very good shot and probably didn't have a proper set up and Trump got extremely lucky. Sammy Gravano in an interview said for sure it was a hit (therefore not a lone nut job). Being a former hitman for the mob he knows what he's talking about. Crooks has zero social media footprints and both parents are behavioral psychologists....which is just weird. And I mean look at the kid. You couldn't cast a better person as a brainwashed manchurian candidate.


by BGnight P

You don't realize how many Dem and Repubs are registering opposite to vote in the other's primaries. I'm a reg'd Dem and my father, who's a raging libtard, is a reg'd Repub. This is extremely common nowadays. Why don't they just look at his voting record instead?

The gaslighting that right wing white's are the biggest threat to "democracy" is only believed by a very special segment of society. Can anyone site a politically motivated violent

There was that guy who smashed Paul Pelosi's head in with a hammer and said he was there to kidnap and interrogate Nancy "and break her kneecaps if she lied" for being "the leader of the pack of lies".


by BGnight P

Wait...who were the Jan 6 victims? AOC?? Only person killed was a defenseless female veteran. Looooooool. Funny how leftist "mostly peaceful" protests don't traumatize anyone, but waving people into the Capitol and taking pictures with them is a mental health crisis.

The biggest group of deaths from individuals who were involved in the event are cops killing themselves afterwards. I guess its possibly unrelated, but probably related.


by BGnight P

It was either staged by Trump with real bullets and real people dying or it was a deep state hit and he was just lucky as ****. Everyone in shooting circles says what a slam dunk that shot that was by even a very mediocre shooter. I for one am on the fence.

Most logical explanation is Crooks was a patsy (MKUltra or not hard to say) and was nudged into doing it by spooks and thus security was lax as a result of it being planned by higher ups

Sounds like a fantastic plan.


by coordi P

There was that guy who smashed Paul Pelosi's head in with a hammer and said he was there to kidnap and interrogate Nancy "and break her kneecaps if she lied" for being "the leader of the pack of lies".

You mean his skittles lover. Nice try.


by BGnight P

You mean his skittles lover. Nice try.

tf is wrong with you?


by coordi P

Sounds like a fantastic plan.

He still hit Trump while his head was moving with a 5" crosswind. I shoot rifles a decent amount. While a 150 yd head shot should be easy with practice, it only takes a flinch to screw it up. I'm sure they knew it was a gamble to an extent. 8 or 9/10 times the kid gets the job done.


wtf is a "skittles lover?"


from 150 yds it is a very easy shot.

- rushing
- not properly set up
- sight not properly calibrated
- decoy

all things that could've led to the miss. but from that distance it would not be hard to hit, and with a semi-automatic, should easily be able to fire off 3-5 rounds and connect with a few.

the most logical theory is he was simply a bad shot.

other theories are interesting, but wading into the conspiratorial territory


by BGnight P

It was either staged by Trump with real bullets and real people dying or it was a deep state hit and he was just lucky as ****. Everyone in shooting circles says what a slam dunk that shot that was by even a very mediocre shooter. I for one am on the fence.

Most logical explanation is Crooks was a patsy (MKUltra or not hard to say) and was nudged into doing it by spooks and thus security was lax as a result of it being planned by higher ups

Conspiracy theory thread ------------->


by BGnight P

You mean his skittles lover. Nice try.

wat?


by housenuts P

65% of Americans believe there was a conspiracy in JFK killing. So if you're on team narrative/lone gunman you're in a smaller set of the population.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/514310/deca...

Unfortunately, 65% of Americans believing something is evidence only of the fact that a large swathe of the American public are gullible and stupid. About 85% of them believe that there is a magic fairy in the sky who watches over their every move and sometimes suspends laws of physics on their behalf if asked nicely, and they are going to go and live with it when they die. I am not joking. One of them is even posting ITT as we speak.

Also, almost 50% of them voted for Donald Trump. All in all, I'd say that appealing to polls of what Americans think as being indicative of anything other than what Americans think is highly misguided.


by d2_e4 P

About 85% of them believe that there is a magic fairy in the sky who watches over their every move and sometimes suspends laws of physics on their behalf if asked nicely, and they are going to go and live with it when they die.

Wackadoodles


Skittles = rainbow, rainbow = gay


by coordi P

Skittles = rainbow, rainbow = gay

Hopefully next one is a perma for our bible thumping friend BGNight. He's certainly been campaigning for it relentlessly.


by BGnight P

You mean his skittles lover. Nice try.

BGnight is only just back from a week long ban for homophobic and misogynistic posting. Apparently the lesson was not learned, so now we will try two weeks. Further instances will be a permanent ban.


Fwiw Biden is more sky fairy believing than Trump. Not sure where Kamala stands.


by housenuts P

Fwiw Biden is more sky fairy believing than Trump. Not sure where Kamala stands.

Sky fairy believing appears to be a condition that sees no political divide, although I think it's indisputable that the most fervent/fundamentalist believers are generally republican and atheists generally lean democratic.

Additionally, some politicians just straight up lie about believing in god because to admit to being an atheist would be tantamount to political suicide in the US. It's all but a statistical impossibility that there isn't a single atheist out of the 500 or however many members of congress, yet every single one of them to a man/woman will probably tell you they believe in god.

Trump certainly does like to talk about the bible and pose with it, but I sincerely doubt he has ever opened one.


by housenuts P

I'm not sure, ask montrealcrops

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...

Such hates with my name.


by Trolly McTrollson P

So a violent Republican dipshit had an account on a Nazi social media platform, that checks out.

Well if you read his posts he's defending bidens policy's. If he signed up on a right wing site to fight right wingers that means something


Has it been confirmed that those are definitely his posts? I mean, not that I am in any way attempting to impugn the honour and integrity of the founder of some alt-right social networking site, but you know, trust but verify and all that.


Didn’t Trump autograph Bibles for people?


by Crossnerd P

Didn’t Trump autograph Bibles for people?

Ok, you got me. Guess he has opened one, then.


by 57 On Red P

The fairly obvious difference is that the rifle bullet, on a fractionally different trajectory, would have entered his skull and killed him, which a speck of debris from a teleprompter (and there was no such debris, because it's clear that the teleprompters weren't hit) wouldn't.

I think you are missing my point.

The consequences of a failed assassination, and the severity of the security failure, would be identical even if it were proven indisputably that Trump was hit by debris rather than the actual bullet.


Reply...