[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff

Oh good, glad we cleared all that up then.

Whoa, man. That sounds pretty serious alright. I thought you were just kidding around. But hey, it looks like you mean business here.

elaborate

You not gonna tell me if you have a doctorate or not?

Oh I missed the question, yes. But not in jacking off.

Yes, I got all of those.

This just seems lazy.

I'm pretty sure e d'a is a PhD. So, we have 2 PhDs in STEM fields explaining how peer review works ("appeal to authority" here, lol), and we have Dunces with the opposing view. Whom to trust, it's a poser! Or, a "poseur", as some would say.

I did, right after that sentence if you keep reading.

[Quote=me]literally every single aspect of 9/11 points to there being a conspiracy-- stuff before 9/11, stuff after 9/11, and everything during 9/11. It's all such a joke that if you haven't figured it out by now you never will, hence the futility in these sorts of discussions.[/quote]

"Joke" in this context means something like "loltastic".

That's the level of discourse I've come to expect. Well done.

Do you think it's ironic that the Project For a New American Century led up by all the neocons responsible for 9/11 called for a "new harbor Pearl Harbor" just a year before they got one?

I don't think it's ironic because I don't know what that project is, who the neocons responsible for 9/11 are, or what a "new harbor Pearl Harbor" is, but it does sound awfully like one of those "the conspirators have been telling us in true Bond villain style all along, except as always they only ever drop hints that we have no hope of deciphering until after the fact" deals.

When was the last time one of you people actually predicted a conspiracy from these subtle hints that the evildoers are constantly dropping?

Do you think I'm interested in taking your surveys? I don't want to know which Harry Potter broom I am or whatever you're getting at. If you want to make a point, make it without asking me stupid questions.

**** my phone

I missed this post but maybe we can look into some of the evidence on wtc being detonated because thermite would be found in the ashes regardless of whether it was blown up or collapsed on its own. But i can certainly aee why it would gain so much traction

I was make a try at the discourse you were looking for but I guess you're not actually interested after all...go figure.

No, you were certainly not trying for anything that I was looking for. Good lord. Do you just not know how to make a point or construct an argument? Because that decidedly was not even close.

Here, I'll give you a tip if you aren't sure how to proceed without asking dumb questions. Instead of asking them, just pretend like you did and you got the answer that would disagree with your assumptions or beliefs from me already, and then go forward from there. If the next step in your mind is just another question, do the same thing. It will save us both a lot of time and effort.

You seem pretty insufferable but no doubt you've heard that before.

I am going to go ahead and make you down for "not ironic" that they would call for a new Pearl Harbor and get one just one year.

Still at that same level of discourse, I see.

Cool. Now, ask yourself what the next step for making your argument would be and say that. If it's a question, just keep doing the assume thing until you get to the part where you make your #@@)(#$@ argument.

One step at a time, we can get through this.

edit to add: I'll try to explain this for you. If your argument relies on how I respond to your questions, then your argument sucks. How I respond to a question is 100% irrelevant to what happened on 9/11/01. Do you see that? This is why I say you aren't interested in the actual truth, only justifying your beliefs. You can justify your beliefs by twisting or reacting to things I said, but what I say is completely irrelevant to the actual truth. Asking questions like you did just exposes your motives for us all to see.

What's the joke? Who's telling it to whom? You're sure you're not just using "joke" in a figurative sense?

The evidence for thermite being present is extremely thin, but it's literally the only working theory either of these guys can scrape together so be kind.