[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff
KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.
If you still think that AQ did 9/11 you should be in adult day care.
heads-up poker is definitely how you determine who is smarter.
My friend. Care to play some heads-up to see who is smarter? You’ve played a lot of SNGs, we can play HU in those if you want
Lol. A smart person would have learnt his lesson from what happened the last time we did a challenge of his own choice to see who was smarter.
I've never played HU other than at the end of an MTT when I've luckboxed into the last 2, so I suspect I'd not fare well in a HU match. Probably means I am very dumb.
Lol. A smart person would have learnt his lesson from what happened the last time we did a challenge of his own choice to see who was smarter.
I've never played HU other than at the end of an MTT when I've luckboxed into the last 2, so I suspect I'd not fare well in a HU match. Probably means I am very dumb.
Again, you haven’t beaten my asvab acore. And you couldn’t even find five people on this entire forum who have either. It’s a freeroll for you if you can. Should be easy seeing as how stupid you know I am
You’re welcome to keep trying but until you score in the top 1% or higher, then you’ll be below me.
GG
Again, you haven’t beaten my asvab acore. And you couldn’t even find five people on this entire forum who could either.
You’re welcome to keep trying but until you score in the top 1% or higher, then you’ll be below me.
GG
Are you saying that the online test we took wasn't the ASVAB? Did they lie to us?
And lolol, you want me to go canvassing random posters on this forum to see who can beat your score? Genius, kid.
Are you saying that the online test we took wasn't the ASVAB? Did they lie to us?
And lolol, you want me to go canvassing random posters on this forum to see who can beat your score? Genius, kid.
No. It wasn’t. I have an official score on govt paperwork.
You’re the one who thinks I’m so dumb. I gave you a $200 free roll to find 5 people who scored higher than me on a forum full of geniuses.
Ofc not a lot of really smart 2p2ers join the military but if I’m the dufus you are sure I am then finding five people who tested smarter than me is quite easy
No. It wasn’t. I have an official score on govt paperwork.
You’re the one who thinks I’m so dumb. I gave you a $200 free roll to find 5 people who scored higher than me on a forum full of geniuses.
Ofc not a lot of really smart 2p2ers join the military but if I’m the dufus you are sure I am then finding five people who tested smarter than me is quite easy
How do you suggest I go about this search?
shocked to learn that pw is korean
Hey, check it out, my old chess thread is still open! I'll continue there.
Hey, check it out, my old chess thread is still open! I'll continue there.
Deuces, do you think its most likely that an empty plane hit WTC 1-2 while a boarded plane hit the pentagon?
I haven't been paying too much attention but I'm under the impression that it might be time to get some backup in the thread.
The important things for you guys to know is that 9/11 is a complete joke and literally every single aspect of 9/11 points to there being a conspiracy-- stuff before 9/11, stuff after 9/11, and everything during 9/11. It's all such a joke that if you haven't figured it out by now you never will, hence the futility in
This is an important point. You can look at most any phenomenon and find some inconsistencies here and there, some things which don't seem to add up. That doesn't mean the accepted, straightforward version of things is incorrect. I hope we can all agree that the Trump assassination attempt was, in reality, a troubled kid who somehow got off a few shots at Trump due to lapses in security. Was Trump's ear shot directly or was it a piece of podium? How did the counter sniper's not see him? etc. etc. but even though we can't resolve everything about it it still seems clear what happened.
With 9/11, however, it's like every other claim the state makes is an obvious lie or untruth. Also, observations which are clearly significant are left totally unaddressed. Not accounting for the heat blooms is like seeing a fireball on the stage at the Trump assassination attempt and no one mentions it at all.
I've always maintained that the best thing to focus on is the actual physics of the "collapse" of the towers but that's the only area where you guys have to resort to magic to explain your ideas.
I stated the best evidence supporting the controlled demolition hypothesis. That received no reply that I saw so far. But even physics doesn't impress these people. This is a psychological phenomenon we are dealing with, a mass phenomenon of group psychology. In a few months pretty much everyone here is going to cast a vote for people who are actively committing an ethnic genocide. Before, during, and after voting they will be telling themselves what a good person they are. This is where we are now, living among people who have succumbed to mass delusions. I think they feel that if they face certain truths, such as they are actively enabling genocide, they will have some kind of mental breakdown. That's why they project onto me that I'm a homeless vagrant or something. It's what they fear will happen to them if they don't conform. I can't assure them that they wouldn't have some kind of change in mental health. Maybe not everyone is strong enough to hold truths against the tribe.
Deuces, do you think its most likely that an empty plane hit WTC 1-2 while a boarded plane hit the pentagon?
I posted on the Pentagon strike:
There was evidence of a plane. It had knocked down some light poles, damaged some trees, and damaged a power station on the way in. There was DNA from passengers known to have been on the plane recovered from the scene. That could be manipulated but there is no reason to assume it was. There is also tracking data from the flight data recorder showing a path which was (very loosely, given) corroborated by many eye witnesses.
While the hole punched out was curiously small and the public has never got to see the most of the physical evidence (which is zealously guarded by the FBI), I can't think of any motive for deception here as far as what struck the Pentagon. I see the motive for deception about who struck the Pentagon. No way do I think the alleged hijackers could fly Boeing Jets in the manner observed, for example. But it appears that a 757 did in fact strike the Pentagon that morning.
I have no reason to think any of the planes were empty. I'm not a "Loose Change" type of conspiracy dude.
I stated the best evidence supporting the controlled demolition hypothesis. That received no reply that I saw so far.
Can you quote this? I don't remember you posting it, but it probably got lost amidst all your interminable bloviating.
If you're talking about the rate of fall, that was addressed by e d'a and the assertion that the rate of collapse cannot exceed acceleration due to gravity appears to be false.
What's going on with Deuces though? Where has he strayed? I've always maintained that the best thing to focus on is the actual physics of the "collapse" of the towers but that's the only area where you guys have to resort to magic to explain your ideas. And once you have people resorting to magic they are lost. For everything non-physics related you'll of course always come up with some sort of bullshit to explain away the myriad things tha
There was one clear physics claim that could be evaluated and it was wrong. No other physics claim was made other than it will be so basic people who have never studied civil engineering, materials science etc could understand it. But it has never been actually made.
I think it would've been a better conspiracy to leave the buildings partially standing 😀
I'm more A&E911Truth. Follow the evidence, fit observations (all the significant observations) into a reasonable hypothesis. This is why I've been saying for a like 15 years that the government has no case against KSM for this. I wasn't surprised by the plea deal. I can make far better predictions because I stick to the evidence.
Maybe most importantly, understand the limits of knowledge.
Again, I don't think it's possible to know who did 9/11 with the publicly available evidence. I don't think it's possible to know exactly how they did it. If you understood that there is such a thing as limits to knowledge you might not be so quick to accept the hand waiving over every support for the government's version. Then again there are 1500 other ways to know the government's story is a false narrative and you don't accept any of those.
So you are someone who would, were you a citizen in Nazi Germany, be a Nazi scientist doing torturous experiments on those the Nazis deemed not human. It's not a bad survival strategy, aligning yourself with power no matter the ideology of that power. It's a good survival strategy which is why many smart people choose it. But I don't see why you just can't admit that that is what you are doing. Why can't you just say "yeah the government is lying to me, it is run by psychopaths trying to increase their wealth and power, but they break me off nicely so I'm here for it."?
