[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff

Peter Dale Scott theory

I've got a theory too. It was a freak gust of wind. The Al Qaida guys were on the planes by coincidence, if they were there at all. I'm gonna call it the d2 theory. Prove me wrong.

I actually had the wind blowing the planes into the buildings, but that's a very good point. How do we know there were any planes at all? Was there any surveillance cameras showing them taking off? That lyin' CNN footage of them crashing lol? SHOW ME THE EVIDENCEEEEE.

The scary thing about your post is there is a sizable faction of these nutters that believe the planes were entirely faked. Seriously. They are literally called "no-planers."

Whereas McCrackhead here is just a no-brainer.

Evidence?

Deuces, if the Al Qaida guys were on the planes but the planes were controlled remotely, do they still get their 72 virgins?

You mentioned DNA from passengers in the pentagon crash.

Did Al Qaeda board and crash the plane into the pentagon while coincidently an empty plane was remotely flown into the WTCs?

It's because inductive reasoning works a lot better

yeah but they are all dog ugly

You seem to just assume the alleged hijackers were AQ. Did the claims of the loan officer at Agriculture, posted above, convince you of that?

I've never seen anything indicating the planes were empty and I don't think they were. I don't think the alleged hijackers were AQ and I speculate that the Boeings were modified into drones. If the planes were a ruse for the collapses, which is certainly the case because of physics, then the pilot training as a ruse for drone control isn't too much of a stretch. It would fit with both the technical sophistication of the attackers and their aim to substantiate their misdirection.

I assume it could have been AQ because I am not seeing much evidence of anything else.

You're positing another theory that I am taking into consideration which is that the planes may have been filled with passengers with the plane being hijacked via drone technology and flown into various locations?

Maybe that did happen, but what information are you seeing that points to this? To me, remotely flying an airliner into the WTC that were also wired for demolition while also simultaneously detonating a building down the street seems a bit thin to me.

under drone theory is the flight 93 tape faked or are the family members who recounted listening to it in on the conspiracy?

What cracks me up the best about controlled demolition is the dozens(hundreds?) of people that had to know about it and somehow, without anyone noticing, prepare three giant ****ing buildings for demolition. It takes weeks to prepare a completely empty building 1/10th the size for demolition. I actually LOL to myself thinking about secret night missions dressed as the cleaning crew, opening up walls to expose the steel beams, attaching the explosives, running the wires back to wherever then patching the walls exactly as they were before they got there. Without anyone noticing.

Then, as a distraction, fly two planes into the two towers at exactly the right place so it won't completely destroy the prepared demolition infrastructure and make it look like the collapse started at the exact same place as the location of impact. Oh yeah, don't forget they had to bring down WTC7 at the same time to destroy some secret government stuff and collect on a huge insurance payout or whatever. It's comedy gold.

Also, it's been 23 years and not one person involved in this super secret planning has spoken in any capacity about this on or off the record? Really?

I have no reason to believe AQ was not behind 9/11 but if it came out sometime that someone else was responsible I wouldn't be terribly surprised. I also maintain that the buildings collapsing was a nice bonus but it would have had a similar impact to USA#1 had we all had to look at two destroyed icons of NYC for months/years while they either repaired them or demolished them.

Bro, it's high school physics stuff. I mean, come on, did you not see the cardboard box simulation? Once we verify the inputs to that model that should settle the matter once and for all.

I have a pet 9/11 conspiracy conspiracy theory of my own actually. I think cardboard box guy is Dunces' IRL identity, cleverly disguised with the use of glasses. Anyone ever see them in the same room?

Dude, is there a course on YouTube University that I can take?

Anything with "truth" in the channel name should be a good start. That's the ultimate stamp of reliability and veracity.

deuces, don't you think this is a bit overly complex when they could have just pretended like terrorists must have set the detonations?

definitely feels like a classic case of confirmation bias here where you're missing out on how your envisioned version of events is not only absurdly and needlessly complex but also a hundred different things would all need to go perfectly and thousands of people would need to keep quiet about it as well

let's say it was an inside job, why not just say "it was terrorists who rigged the building for demolition" when that involves far fewer moving parts and fellow conspirators... especially since, and get this, there's genuinely zero benefit to making it extra complex

The problem with your theory is that it doesn't leave Dunces much room for indulging his delusions of superiority to the sheeple like us who lack his intellectual horsepower to put it all together.

i mean i guess if i were going to burn down my house for insurance fraud, i would instead stage a ufo crash landing on my property and then set the fire and blame that fire on the ufos because then my deceit can more easily fly under the radar and i can finally collect that sweet insurance money and finally hide all the evidence that my ancestors were nazis in hiding

I won't pretend to be able to get into the minds of kooks like Deuces, but I suspect they probably imagine scenarios like this on a daily basis for the most mundane of events.

Also, don't forget to make sure that the several thousand people involved all sign an NDA so that the story never leaks out.