Politics and Society Moderation Discussion Only Fans Thread

Politics and Society Moderation Discussion Only Fans Thread

Hello everyone. I've closed the previous mod thread, and opened this to capture all issues related to moderation policies and actions going forward. I'll kick it off by reposting my intro post from the other thread. Again, I'm happy to be here and look forward to hearing from you.

Browser


Hello everyone.

I'm very pleased to have the opportunity to serve as a moderator in Politics and Society. I asked for this position because I believe we are experiencing a polarization in our politics and society unseen since the 1960s. We may well be at a juncture from which we will either make great progress or suffer great setbacks in regards to our democratic foundations and civil rights over the next few years. So I believe it is important to maintain a forum for discussing these important topics. When the other mods had to step back a bit due to their real life time obligations, I asked to join the mod team to help keep the forum going.

I have not followed this forum in the past, though I have been reading through threads the last few days and made a few posts. This has allowed me to get a sense of the initial impression the forum likely makes on new readers who are deciding if our forum is a place they would like to visit regularly and participate in. While I see some familiar names from the live poker forum, many of you I have not had any interaction with to date. I have no preconceived notions of anyone's posting behavior and will essentially start from a clean slate.

I will shortly post more about my modding approach and give my initial impressions of the forum based on my observations over the last several days. I will be soliciting your input on things you like about the forum that you want to remain, and things you don't like that you would like me to change. Your candid input and feedback is very important to me. Especially, please don't hesitate to let me know if you think a policy or a proposal is a bad idea. I'd rather hear it before it goes into effect than after.

My overall modding principle is simple: Be Nice. Disagreement need not be disrespectful, and everyone must be treated with respect. Calling a poster derogatory names or hurling snarky insults never usefully advances a discussion. It just bogs things down and turns off many would be participants. And it's not nice. Don't do it.

My goal is to have a forum where people with a wide variety of opinions along the political spectrum enjoy expressing and debating their views in a spirited manner, free from insults, bigotry and denigrating comments. If you enjoy discussing these important and often polarizing issues in a passionate, yet respectful manner, I look forward to getting to know you and working with you to create a forum people will enjoy visiting and contributing to. You can be as committed, determined and relentless as you like in advocating for your position. Be persuasive, thought provoking and challenging. But be nice.

I want to thank tame_deuces and King Spew for their support in bringing me onboard and for all the time and effort they have put into making the forum better. While I am taking over most of the day to day modding responsibilities, both are retaining their mod status and superpowers, and will be supporting the forum as their availability permits. And I personally welcome their continued advice and feedback.

Again, I am happy to be here and look forward to getting to know you.

Browser

24 December 2022 at 02:15 AM
Reply...

1077 Replies

i
a

by Luckbox Inc P

So what exactly did I get wrong?


Still not understanding how self bans work.


by Bobo Fett P

Still not understanding how self bans work.

So my assessment of the Kelhus situation is 100% accurate. Thanks.


I said no such thing, You're welcome.

I mean, I guess it is possible he's the unluckiest guy ever, and Quick Ben and jdock and numerous other accounts were just banned because he was banned or whatever other reason you're using to justify your fake "well ban me too" posts. But maybe, just maybe, you should consider that the reason he's had countless accounts banned by many different mods is because he deserved a few of them?


by Bobo Fett P

I said no such thing, You're welcome.

I mean, I guess it is possible he's the unluckiest guy ever, and Quick Ben and jdock and numerous other accounts were just banned because he was banned or whatever other reason you're using to justify your fake "well ban me too" posts. But maybe, just maybe, you should consider that the reason he's had countless accounts banned by many different mods is because he deserved a few of them?

Well Named has already stated that the reason why Kelhus was banned repeatedly was because of his prior bans, of which only one was deseved. I'm going to trust his judgement there.


by well named P

I haven't really participated in POG politics in a while, and not much on 2+2 at all recently. I'm guessing that trend will continue, so there's no real reason for me to wade into a topic like this, and I have no intention of starting some campaign to overturn the moderation decisions here, but just fwiw:

I disagreed with kelhus on just about everything, and frequently told him so. I often think he has the wrong end of the stick, and that he

Here is the post.


Trust whoever you like. The facts are that his previous bans played a role in subsequent bans, as is the case for many people. And so did his own behaviour.

Whatever you want to believe, hopefully you've at least learned that your "well ban me too then" act is getting a bit played out.


by chillrob P

Why in the world is there even a politics thread in the Puzzles and Other Games subforum?

It used to be the containment forum for godawful posters like Kelhus and Luckbox. Now politics occupies that role.


Also, from going back to reading that thread, apparently it him talking about the testosterone levels in elephants that got him banned, not for anything related to zygotes. My apologies there.


by Bobo Fett P

Trust whoever you like. The facts are that his previous bans played a role in subsequent bans, as is the case for many people. And so did his own behaviour.

Whatever you want to believe, hopefully you've at least learned that your "well ban me too then" act is getting a bit played out.

I'll play my acts however I want to play them. It's my show.


by Luckbox Inc P

Here is the post.


Right, so he didn't say "the reason why Kelhus was banned repeatedly was because of his prior bans", but that "In my experience, kelhus has been banned more often for having been banned before than for actually causing problems that require banning". And also that his "memory is fuzzy".

But if you want to go on telling yourself that all but one or two bans had nothing to do with his behaviour on the subsequent accounts, go ahead and do so if it makes you feel better. I'll continue to live in the real world.

by Luckbox Inc P

I'll play my acts however I want to play them. It's my show.


Of course; I've not suggested you should do otherwise. Shows that don't rely on being profitable can continue on long after anyone was entertained by them, if they ever were. 😃


by Bobo Fett P

Right, so he didn't say "the reason why Kelhus was banned repeatedly was because of his prior bans", but that "In my experience, kelhus has been banned more often for having been banned before than for actually causing problems that require banning". And also that his "memory is fuzzy".

But if you want to go on telling yourself that all but one or two bans had nothing to do with his behaviour on the subsequent accounts, go ahead and do so i

You're the super moderator, why don't you go ahead and tell us what he posted that has led to him being banned all of these times?

Also, the fuzzy memory is on the first ban...that's what he can't remember. well although Kelhus himself has stated that he did deserve one ban. He never stated his memory was fuzzy for the others just that he believes the others are due to him being previously banned.


LOL if you think I'm going to go back through 10-15 years of bans and try to dig up the posts that got him banned. I'm not going to do hours of work to try and dissuade you from your silly belief in your oddly-chosen posting idol for whom you'd apparently lay down your 2+2 life. I know that even getting jdock permitted to come back with an account exiled to H&F only was met with objections from numerous mods, and that he's up to double digit accounts banned by several mods. And I've seen some of his posting work. I don't need any further convincing that this goes beyond one or two bans that have haunted him ever since.


by Luckbox Inc P

So what exactly did I get wrong?

You need to request your ban in ATF.


by Bobo Fett P

LOL if you think I'm going to go back through 10-15 years of bans and try to dig up the posts that got him banned. I'm not going to do hours of work to try and dissuade you from your silly belief in your oddly-chosen posting idol for whom you'd apparently lay down your 2+2 life. I know that even getting jdock permitted to come back with an account exiled to H&F only was met with objections from numerous mods, and that he's up to double digi

So basically you have nothing other than that some mods don't like him and that you've seen some of his posting. And this is despite you actually having access to his mod notes.


I have no ideas if mods like him or not; I just told you how they felt about him returning as a poster. So, carry on with your preconceived notions, and best of luck with the whole martyr thing.


by Bobo Fett P

I have no ideas if mods like him or not; I just told you how they felt about him returning as a poster. So, carry on with your preconceived notions, and best of luck with the whole martyr thing.

They are hardly preconceived notions. My opinion is based on what Well Named has said and what I have seen from my own experiences with Kelhus.

That and the fact that you have posted nothing to dissuade me of those notions despite your ability to do so. I mean just pull up one of his accounts. What did Quick Ben post to get banned?


by Luckbox Inc P

You're the super moderator, why don't you go ahead and tell us what he posted that has led to him being banned all of these times?

Also, the fuzzy memory is on the first ban...that's what he can't remember. well although Kelhus himself has stated that he did deserve one ban. He never stated his memory was fuzzy for the others just that he believes the others are due to him being previously banned.

It isn't as easy as you think. Not every moderator has been diligent over the last fifteen years about including a user note every time they ban someone.

And Kelhus seems to have posted under ~10 accounts. I wouldn't be surprised if some of his bans were due to creating accounts to continue an argument after he was banned, but that is an obviously bannable offense imo.

I never banned him during my brief tenure fwiw.


by quick ben P

I've been wondering about what kind of winrate you need to beat the rake at the live card rooms. I play in a 25/50 game (not usd, 5000=115 usd) where there is no cap on buy ins. They rake 10% up to a max of 300, and I usually buy in for 10k. I've been beating the game but the rake struck me as kind of high, being used to online rates.

What happened with Quick Ben? I didn't know Kelhus then but it's only showing 1 post, this one under that account. Did his posts get zapped?


by Luckbox Inc P

What happened with Quick Ben? I didn't know Kelhus then but it's only showing 1 post, this one under that account. Did his posts get zapped?

I don't know.


Actually that account isn't even banned, but I was under the impression that that was one of his.



https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...

Here is his last post under Kelhus100 and I know that no posts were deleted there so people can read the actual discussion in POG that got him banned.

Also Kelhus has informed me that his oldest two accounts were zapped as part of some agreement he made with Mat.


by uke_master P

This doesn't make much sense. Has anyone in the history of the forum ever been "cancelled" because other non-mod posters have accused their statements as being, say, transphobic? Like, what does that even mean?

Regardless, I think it is a much larger error to make to err on the side of being transphobic or racist than it is to err on the side of being slightly too broad in what statements are labeled as such. You've got your priorities back

This cancel culture attitude needs to be moded out of the community. Its a plague on sincere dialogue.




We def had that sort of dynamic altho I never called him a baby killer. I said he supported it.

I also praised him for his honesty many times.


by Victor P

like, objectively natediggity knows that bombing babies is bad. and in fact he is really mad about the negligible amount of babies that died during the Hamas attack. but goddamnit if objectivity doesnt just go out the window when he hears that Gazan babies are dead.

dont make those contradictions apparent he says. dont make me face them he says.


at least the Zionists are honest that their lives are more important.

you ban Kelhus or whatever but somehow Victor gets a lifetime pass. Look at this garbage. Is the reason he is allowed to say whatever the F he wants is so you have 6 posters instead of 5?

What an absolute joke.

Lifetime pass is hilarious. Oh he's never been banned before so nope, can't do it now.


Reply...