ex-President Trump

ex-President Trump

I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?

So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at low-info Boomers like my religions aunts. I have two questions:

a) Is anyone here who supports Trump bothered by lies like this?

b) Does anyone know what he's even talking about here? Like is there some grain of truth that he's embellishing on bigly?

w 2 Views 2
28 April 2019 at 04:18 AM
Reply...

8574 Replies

i
a

by Playbig2000 P

President Trump's assets are very well protected.

Protected how?


Invisible forcefield and a moat with sharks


I think it's all stored in the Vatican.


PB can't tell us, he's under NDA. Like Stormy Daniels.

Wonder if he's been under all the things Stormy was.


Trump assets are "protected" but still assailable


https://edition.cnn.com/2024/03/21/polit...


by Luciom P

Trump assets are "protected" but still assailable


https://edition.cnn.com/2024/03/21/polit...

I have no idea why they are asking a criminology professor about judgment enforcement, but LLCs controlled through trusts is what I would expect to see.


by Rococo P

I have no idea why they are asking a criminology professor about judgment enforcement, but LLCs controlled through trusts is what I would expect to see.

Because Passas is an actual real expert about how criminals hide money ( and how to bypass many of their Russian dolls)



by Luciom P

Trump assets are "protected" but still assailable


https://edition.cnn.com/2024/03/21/polit...

The judgement was not only against Trump personally, it included the Trump Organization, the Trump Revocable Trust, several LLCs, and specific properties.

Also, LOL that it would be difficult to unwind his various companies considering they are all under a court appointed monitor. If there's a moat around his properties it can be crossed without getting your ankles wet.


Seizing Trump's properties will backfire bigtime.

https://rumble.com/v4kuwpl-frank-luntz-w...


by Didace P

The judgement was not only against Trump personally, it included the Trump Organization, the Trump Revocable Trust, several LLCs, and specific properties.

Also, LOL that it would be difficult to unwind his various companies considering they are all under a court appointed monitor. If there's a moat around his properties it can be crossed without getting your ankles wet.

I think the main idea is that it will take a little longer than what it would with a normal company which directly owns it's assets.

I do agree the assets are still assailable that's what I wrote to begin with.

I am not sure what the rules are if, for ex, the state starts procedures then trump is able to post a bond for the full amount required in say 20 days, and no property has been foreclosured upon yet, does it all stop until the appeal is exhausted?

Because here the timing is very tricky , given trump will own stock which can be posted as collateral for a loan/bond, but only after it's traded so you can assess the fair value, and ticker DJT will only be traded next week.

Very curious about the developments


by Luciom P

I think the main idea is that it will take a little longer than what it would with a normal company which directly owns it's assets.

Okay, maybe a day.


I suspect that if trump's assetts start gettign sezied then a shitload of trouble is awaiting trump & co as who knows what floats to the surface

when i see talk of trumps assets being protected I'm thinking mob more than law.


by chezlaw P

I suspect that if trump's assetts start gettign sezied then a shitload of trouble is awaiting trump & co as who knows what floats to the surface

when i see talk of trumps assets being protected I'm thinking mob more than law.

Nah lol, it's just about corporate entity structures.

Anyway I might be wrong togheter with CNN (which isn't like the most trustworthy source in the world i admit) and it might be the case as Didace is right and trump assets will easily fold


by Brian James P

Seizing Trump's properties will backfire bigtime.

https://rumble.com/v4kuwpl-frank-luntz-w...

Summary?


by chillrob P

Summary?

Summary is that BJ can't post right now, he's busy:




by chillrob P

What do BLM riots have to do with voting? Those weren't endorsing anyone for president.

You said you weren’t surprised someone as violent as iron Mike would vote for trump. I was simply pointing out that there are plenty of violent people who vote for Biden too. In other words, trying to suggest violent people only vote one way is a pretty stupid thing to say.


by bahbahmickey P

You said you weren’t surprised someone as violent as iron Mike would vote for trump. I was simply pointing out that there are plenty of violent people who vote for Biden too. In other words, trying to suggest violent people only vote one way is a pretty stupid thing to say.

How did that post point out that there are plenty of violent people that vote for Biden? How do you know who the people who incited those riots voted for?


this is a tough situation. blahblahblahmickey is an authority on stupid things to say


I will not be surprised we find out Monday some rich person, lent Trump the $500 million he is bragging about, to post bond.


Seem trump was able to monetize his truth social « empire ».
HIs fine and I suppose lot of shareholders will lose a ton of cash eventually .

https://www.investopedia.com/trump-truth...

KEY TAKEAWAYS
Digital World Acquisition Corp. shareholders on Friday reportedly approved the blank check company's merger with the parent company of former President Donald Trump's social media platform, Truth Social.
The stock could start trading under the symbol "DJT," which stands for Donald J. Trump, as early as next week.
Trump will own nearly 80 million shares of the newly formed company, a stake worth more than $3 billion at Thursday's close.


by bahbahmickey P

You said you weren’t surprised someone as violent as iron Mike would vote for trump. I was simply pointing out that there are plenty of violent people who vote for Biden too. In other words, trying to suggest violent people only vote one way is a pretty stupid thing to say.

You're right. I should have said it's not surprising that a convicted rapist would support Trump. They have so much in common!


by Luciom P

Nah lol, it's just about corporate entity structures.

Anyway I might be wrong togheter with CNN (which isn't like the most trustworthy source in the world i admit) and it might be the case as Didace is right and trump assets will easily fold

It's not that CNN is wrong, it's that the "expert" they had on is wrong. This isn't a case where they nabbed a mob boss and now need to figure out where the money is. They already know.


by Montrealcorp P

Seem trump was able to monetize his truth social « empire ».
HIs fine and I suppose lot of shareholders will lose a ton of cash eventually .

https://www.investopedia.com/trump-truth...

I’m morbidly curious how this all plays out tbh

Trump has a 6 month restricted period where he can’t sell shares which I assume he will spend ad nauseum talking up DJT as a great company and it’s going to be the best company and you will all be very very proud of this company so the MAGA chuds buy up shares before 6 months pass and he starts selling the max as he’s allowed


I thoiught he was in a real trouble over the fines. This could be 'with one bound he was free'

I dont really understand how this worked. Presumably he can borrow against these shares even before he can sell?


Reply...