Who Shot dJRt
Dude, other people have answered your questions ITT. I'm not qualified to, I'm not American either.
yeah there's no point in talking to him, he'll just ignore whatever you say and keep puking up random word salads
also you know that the kid was a republican because the right wing derposphere doesn't appear to disputing the point, and instead moved on to this dei secret service thing
Donates to dems on the day biden is inaugurated
Ill give this a -3 Its not as strong as saying your a republican party but the fact he donates on the special day biden is sworn is means something
I saw somewhere this was debunked and it was a different person in PA with the same name. Didn't research beyond that.
How do you know they are wrong? And why isn't whatever metric you are using to say they are wrong used to pick them in the first place?
Often, early picks are mediocre or even not fit to be in the NFL. Often, late picks wind up stars.
These metrics are not available until the players have played a lot in the NFL.
Part of this is players might might not mesh with your coaches and existing players, and other factors beyond the player himself.
If it's hard to tell if a college football player will be a good pro football player, it must be much harder in other cases where you're like, using someone's high school GPA to try to guess if a 42 year old will be a good judge, or using someone's time on an obstacle course to determine if they will be good at law enforcement.
Dude, that's not what people are talking about. In fact, I'm not convinced that anyone ITT shouting "misogyny" has any idea how this conversation started, or what the photo in question was, because if they did, all these accusations wouldn't make any sense. It's all right here in this thread.
uke will never miss an opportunity to wrongfully slander people with invented scenarios and just coincidentally hold himself up on the moral high ground in the process
it's sort of the only thing he does here
Often, early picks are mediocre or even not fit to be in the NFL. Often, late picks wind up stars.
These metrics are not available until the players have played a lot in the NFL.
Part of this is players might might not mesh with your coaches and existing players, and other factors beyond the player himself.
If it's hard to tell if a college football player will be a good pro football player, it must be much harder in other cases where you're
https://www.forbes.com/sites/prishe/2015...
Often, early picks are mediocre or even not fit to be in the NFL. Often, late picks wind up stars.
No
I don't know what your definition of often is, but only 30% of starters were taken in the first round. 70% of starters were taken outside the first round.
shoots leader of the republican party.
This is a pretty big one im going to give it the max -10 points for him being a republican seems like shooting the republican leader will hurt your chances of being a republican
this is an assumption you made and not a fact
in fact, it's downright wrong
there are countless historical examples of this and he would be at the end of a very long list of people assassinated by someone from within their own core for a wide variety of reasons
there are many republicans who absolutely hate trump and refuse to support him as they believe he hijacked the party - not saying that's his motive, i have no clue
but it's incredibly foolish to just say "unlikely he's a republican because they'd never kill their own" as if that were fact
i'm not nearly articulate enough to explain why without sounding like an asshat nor without painting with too broad a stroke...
but
i think women are more likely to discuss the issue to better understand it and possibly empathize with their victims
i never interacted with gizmo or the threads she lorded over so it's a sample size of 1 (if there were other female mods i didn't know), but you are the only mod i've ever seen who was willing to calmly discuss moderation with people who were complaining at you and saying you did terrible moderation - every other mod i've seen that happen to responds with temp bans, post deletions, and threats to shut it or get banned
that alone makes you superbly qualified to be a mod imo because i know if i ever catch heat from you - you'll at least discuss the issue with me so we can come to a better mutual understanding whereas i normally can't get any genuine feedback from mods i've run afoul with beyond hardline threats
maybe it's because you're a female, maybe not, i have no idea, but i suspect it's somewhat correlated
I don't know what your definition of often is, but only 30% of starters were taken in the first round. 70% of starters were taken outside the first round.
Yeah. The article demonstrates what I was saying. E.g.
Undrafted players (14%) were the 3rd most likely group to comprise 2014’s starters…only behind 1st round (30%) and 2nd round (18%) picks.
Especially when you factor in things like, 1st round picks will be given more opportunity. They have to be absolutely awful to not get a ton of starts.
Note, I didn't say that it was a blind guess and first rounders are no better than 7th rounders. I said, considering the job is so specific, considering the info they have, they often still guess wrong.
Dude, that's not what people are talking about. In fact, I'm not convinced that anyone ITT shouting "misogyny" has any idea how this conversation started, or what the photo in question was, because if they did, all these accusations wouldn't make any sense. It's all right here in this thread.
Twitter/X has been a ****ing bloodbath of nonsensical screeching about DEI and photos of that woman in unflattering poses and going on about how the evil former pepsi woman head of the SS supports DEI that hires woman to the SS.
It's an utter embarrassment.
And just lol at rickroll try to pick this up into some personal swipe at me. On cue.
"in female brains, there's more wiring in regions linked to memory and social cognition...women tend to be better at understanding how other people are feeling and knowing the right way to respond in social situations"
https://www.webmd.com/brain/features/how...
Other studies I have read show that women tend to be better than men at reading comprehension. Of course, the ability variation among different members of the same sex is much greater than the difference between the means of the sexes.
Thankfully the kid wasn’t a great shot. Best guess among the few us in my group who would know is that he was going for a call of duty headshot instead of center mass. But then with a cop breathing up your ass and nerves too so who knows. Can’t ask him now.
An experienced shooter with that weapon would have a better chance of missing their TV with a remote control under normal circumstances. And DJT isn’t a small target either
Thankfully the kid wasn’t a great shot. Best guess among the few us in my group who would know is that he was going for a call of duty headshot instead of center mass. But then with a cop breathing up your ass and nerves too so who knows. Can’t ask him now.
An experienced shooter with that weapon would have a better chance of missing their TV with a remote control under normal circumstances. And DJT isn’t a small target either
center of head would've made for less miss opportunities if Trump moved.
How long does it take the bullet to travel that distance? I'm surprised there is time for him to move his head after the trigger is pulled. Or is he moving his head before the trigger is pulled? ELI5 pls.
Twitter/X has been a ****ing bloodbath of nonsensical screeching about DEI and photos of that woman in unflattering poses and going on about how the evil former pepsi woman head of the SS supports DEI that hires woman to the SS.
It's an utter embarrassment.
And just lol at rickroll try to pick this up into some personal swipe at me. On cue.
you are the one making the swipes, but yet again fail to see that because of your smug false superiority that clouds your brain into mush where you honestly think saying men are physically advantaged over women in things like security detail is mysoginistic
and you still haven't pointed to a single post that is because then your attack would have something tangible attached to it and everyone would see through your facade of bs - that is why instead you just generically condemn everything instead of pointing to specific examples
you made 0 posts in this thread about an assassination attempt on the president until you found something to trump up some false outrage on and slander people
you're just a judgemental prick and it'll be a lot healthier for you if you just acknowledge that instead of pretending like you are a good guy - you only post to attack and slander and you create drama everywhere you go where it otherwise didn't exist - multiple people have called you out on this already in the thread and yet sure enough you blame it on me like i'm the problem here not you
notice your defense is whataboutism on twitter and not any specific examples here - you're just looking to cause drama - you just suck
also your telling on yourself when you mention that's all your twitter feed is, you may wish to familiarize yourself with how that algo actually works
