Moderation Questions and General Chat Thread

Moderation Questions and General Chat Thread

The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic failed, and it became a general discussion thread with almost no moderation related posts at all. And those that were posted were so buried in non-mod posts that it became a huge time drain on the mods to sort through them. Then, when off topic posts were deleted posters complained about that.

This led to the closing of the mod discussion thread, replaced by the post report/pm approach. This has filtered out lots of noise, but has resulted at times in the General Discussion Thread turning into a quasi-mod thread. This is not desirable, but going back to the old mod thread is also not a workable option.

Therefore, I have created this new moderation thread, but with a different purpose and ground rules than previous mod threads. The purpose of this thread is to provide a place for posters to pose questions to the mods about how policies are applied; to bring to the mods attention posts they think are inappropriate and reach the level of requiring mod action; and for mods to communicate to posters things like changes or clarifications to policies, bannings, etc.

Now let me tell you what this thread is NOT a place for. It is not for nonmoderation related posts, even if the discussion originates from a comment in in a mod related post. It is not for posters to post their opinions about other posters or whether a poster should be banned. It is not to rehash past grievances about mod decisions from months or years ago. The focus of this thread will be recent posts that require action now. Or questions about current policies and enforcement.

So basically, this is a thread to ask mods questions. Which means, pretty much that only mods should be answering those questions. If a poster asks why a particular post was deleted or allowed, only a mod can answer that. Everyone else who wants to jump in with their opinion or their mod war story needs to stay out of it. It just increases the noise to signal ratio and does nothing to answer the question.

Everyone needs to understand that this thread has very different rules than the old mod thread and any other thread. Any non-moderation post will be deleted on sight. Not moved to the appropriate thread, just deleted. So don't waste your time crafting a masterpiece post about wars or transgender issues or the presidential election and then post it in this thread. It will be gone. Also, this isnt a thread for general commentary about our mods performance. Posting "browser sucks as a mod" or any such posts that don't actually ask about a policy or request a mod action will be deleted. Everyone is entitled to their opinion about the moderation of this forum. But this thread isnt for complaining about mods. You are free to go to the ATF forum and make your concerns about modding in this forum there.

So with that intro, this thread is open for those who need to bring questions about mod policies or bring inappropriate posts to the mods attention. Again, it is NOT a thread for group discussions about other posters or for other posters to answer questions directed to mods.

We'll see how this goes. If you have what you feel is an open issue raised in the General Discussion Thread, please copy that post or otherwise reintroduce the issue here.

Thanks.

30 January 2024 at 05:27 AM
Reply...

6491 Replies

i
a

by Crossnerd P

I have no idea what you're talking about. You, as well as others, were warned to stop with the misogynistic posts or there would be bans. You didn't stop. You were banned.

Hey I am not questioning the ban I thought 5 days was extreme . I am questioning why you never issued the same ultimatum to the folks that said JD Vance sucks dick? When my accusation had merit while JD Vances had none Or why when D2 violated your warnings about him wishing the shooter hadn't missed and continued you never suspended him you just told him to be quiet

Your biased against conservatives and it shows


by lozen P

Or why when D2 violated your warnings about him wishing the shooter hadn't missed and continued you never suspended him you just told him to be quiet

I made a joke about a father, a grandfather and a husband being three different people and needing more ammo. So, yeah, that's not a thing that happened. Have you tried not lying? It works pretty well for most of us.


It was 3 days, as is marked in your user notes.


Lol that's 2 lies in that post. Let's see how many more we can find!


"I can say whatever I want about whomever I want because you guys were goofing around about my guy sucking cock" is a pretty hot take too.


by lozen P

I moved this to the Mod thread as it has no place in Election 2024

Oh please I hadnt had a warning or suspension since 2012 You may not like my politics fine but when the mod warns someone to stop with the wish trump was dead and that person continues and she does nothing but ask him to stop . She allows folks to say JD Vance sucks dick but OMG if you say Kamala did it to advance her career you get a ban

She literally violated her own rule

If I say JD Vance ****s couches, its a satire on his biography. Clearly an exaggeration meant for humorous affect. I don't believe JD Vance ****ed his couch and if he did good for him.

If you say Kamala ****ed her way to the top there is no satire, only bigotry, because you really believe it or desperately want it to be true. And if she did, then good for her.


Sorry to be crude here but if you can **** so good you make it all way to the presidency of the United States, that is world-class sexual prowess, absolute fire. I don't think that's what happened, but damn I wish I was that good in the sack.


by Crossnerd P

It was 3 days, as is marked in your user notes.

Actually I stand corrected but it was 4 I was suspended on the 27th and not allowed back to the 31 st

One rule for thee and one rule for conservatives

Trolly you been on my ignore list for a long time :p


It’s a misogynist myth. Gloria Steinem once said “If women could sleep their way to the top, there’d be a lot more women at the top.”


by lozen P

Actually I stand corrected but it was 4 I was suspended on the 27th and not allowed back to the 31 st

One rule for thee and one rule for conservatives

Trolly you been on my ignore list for a long time :p

You were banned for 3 days, the equivalent of 72 hours. That is what was put into the software.

Liberals eat bans too. Just ask MrDavitWilliam who is currently serving a 5 day.

I’m not moderating your politics; I’m moderating what you choose to post.


by lozen P


One rule for thee and one rule for conservatives


And it is High Time that the conservatives around here get separate Rules. They've had it cushy for far too long.....


by Trolly McTrollson P

Sorry to be crude here but if you can **** so good you make it all way to the presidency of the United States, that is world-class sexual prowess, absolute fire. I don't think that's what happened, but damn I wish I was that good in the sack.

presidential even


If a woman can become president by being fire in bed, that seems like a structural problem with the country's government and not a problem with the woman.


I've been reliably informed that liberals are easily triggered snowflakes, so I am completely perplexed as to why is seems to be conservatives doing pretty much all the crybaby whining around here.


by Trolly McTrollson P

Sorry to be crude here but if you can **** so good you make it all way to the presidency of the United States, that is world-class sexual prowess, absolute fire. I don't think that's what happened, but damn I wish I was that good in the sack.

You guy's are trying hard to rationalize the head scratching pick of Harris as the candidate.


I'd grab my ankles just to be undersecretary of the Dept. of Transportation or to have a cushy ambassador post, imagine getting all the way to the Democratic POTUS nominee.


Would saying that Harris was a DEI pick be considered misogynist? Biden said that he was going to pick a black women to be VP.


by coordi P

If I say JD Vance ****s couches, its a satire on his biography. Clearly an exaggeration meant for humorous affect. I don't believe JD Vance ****ed his couch and if he did good for him.

If you say Kamala ****ed her way to the top there is no satire, only bigotry, because you really believe it or desperately want it to be true. And if she did, then good for her.

how do we not know jd banged couches to get ahead as well?


I feel like Trolly is only fifteen minutes away from posting a picture of his ******* to emphasize the point he is trying to make.


by Rococo P

I feel like Trolly is only fifteen minutes away from posting a picture of his ******* to emphasize the point he is trying to make.

pm sent


by Crossnerd P

It’s a misogynist myth. Gloria Steinem once said “If women could sleep their way to the top, there’d be a lot more women at the top.”


Would it be misogynistic to say I like women on top?


by Crossnerd P

It’s a misogynist myth. Gloria Steinem once said “If women could sleep their way to the top, there’d be a lot more women at the top.”

the well known CIA asset?

https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/femi...


by Didace P

Would it be misogynistic to say I like women on top?

Not misogynistic, just creepy and kinda edgelord-y


I mean, who is your audience for that comment lol


You?


Reply...