Who Shot dJRt
anxiously awaiting crossnerd to enter this thread. 
Is this misogyny still going on itt?
Goodbye for now.
There were like 20 officers who actively watched the shooter set up for 20 minutes where if they did their job she wouldn't have been in that position.
Its telling that you single her out.
yes they did a terrible job.
she is singled out here because there are pictures and videos of her doing a terrible job.
the whole thing was a gigantic failure by secret service, law enforcement and anyone else involved.
What physical advantages do men have over women when it comes to holstering a weapon or being a meat shield?
same as why men dominate chess, poker, and racing - all of which have less physical requirements than the dexterity required to unholster a gun or dive on a president
i definitely misspoke when i narrowed it to physical - but you also still haven't answered whether or not you think there's even a 1% chance for good reason
Pretty ****ing sad that the right wing crazies are trying to turn the assassination into some anti-woman nonsense. Like of all the outrageous SS fails in the attempt, that one of the people surrounding trump in the iconic fist photo happened to be a woman is like 99th on the list of bad ****. But of course it is turned into some culture war moment.
DEI is bigotry. rather than hiring the best person for the job, they hire people to satisfy a predefined quota.
Sounds like Apartheid.
Most people would say that attracting more candidates increases the chances of finding the best candidates.
Well, they didn't have the best candidates out there the other day.
Pretty ****ing sad that the right wing crazies are trying to turn the assassination into some anti-woman nonsense. Like of all the outrageous SS fails in the attempt, that one of the people surrounding trump in the iconic fist photo happened to be a woman is like 99th on the list of bad ****. But of course it is turned into some culture war moment.
Dude, that's not what people are talking about. In fact, I'm not convinced that anyone ITT shouting "misogyny" has any idea how this conversation started, or what the photo in question was, because if they did, all these accusations wouldn't make any sense. It's all right here in this thread.
Pretty ****ing sad that the right wing crazies are trying to turn the assassination into some anti-woman nonsense. Like of all the outrageous SS fails in the attempt, that one of the people surrounding trump in the iconic fist photo happened to be a woman is like 99th on the list of bad ****. But of course it is turned into some culture war moment.
She's probably MAGA-pilled too, that's the funniest part.
Pretty ****ing sad that the right wing crazies are trying to turn the assassination into some anti-woman nonsense. Like of all the outrageous SS fails in the attempt, that one of the people surrounding trump in the iconic fist photo happened to be a woman is like 99th on the list of bad ****. But of course it is turned into some culture war moment.
i don't think anyone had a problem with that woman. she did a fine job. if anything, policy may be better for close protection agents to be at least as big as the person they are meant to protect, but that's certainly not her fault. and some, or all, of the men were smaller than trump too.
but when there is picture and video evidence of one person being drastically incompetent, rather than seeing what was plainly evident to see, the woke left instead says 'wow you are a bigot'.
Lady DEI mod ITT.
The finest mod in the land.
Ok, if it's just about attracting candidates and there are no hiring quotas involved, I stand corrected on that point. I still disagree with the point "it's silly to say that there is a best candidate for a job", which is what I originally objected to.
If there were perfect equality in attracting candidates, ie every person in the country applied for the job, and somehow they were all thoroughly tested and interviewed for the job of physically protecting high ranking government officials and political candidates, with the goal of hiring the most qualified people for the comparatively tiny number of hires, the chances that even a single woman would be in that group are vanishingly small.
Some female applicants of course could be the most qualified for other roles in the secret service, and if the woman being discussed was on the podium for some other purpose, then it could be legitimate for her to protect herself in that situation.
Right. You're agreeing with me, unless I'm very much mistaken.
What physical advantages do men have over women when it comes to holstering a weapon or being a meat shield?
They definitely have more meat. They almost certainly have better coordination for the type of tasks which include holstering a gun.
Yes, I was trying to expand on the general idea of your post with something more specific to the hiring of those tasked with providing physical security.
I dunno man, I've seen a 110lb chick beat the dogshit out of three 250lb+ meatheads with some slick kung fu moves and without even messing up her hair. Unless Hollywood is lying to me now too.
Ok, if it's just about attracting candidates and there are no hiring quotas involved, I stand corrected on that point. I still disagree with the point "it's silly to say that there is a best candidate for a job", which is what I originally objected to.
I think it's true that there usually isn't a best candidate. Even if there were, it would be really hard to know which was best. Think of the NFL. A guy's job is to run a pattern and catch a ball. They have detailed video of him doing this highly finite job for 3 years. They test him in any way they want. There's are experts who makes 7 figures to pick the best player and they are wrong all the time.
And people are affected by prejudice, tend to hire the person most like themselves.
I think their should be more female leos and I read at some point m/f are the best street cop combos, as you get the biggest tool kit.
Having said that, when the job is very physical there might be no reason to cram in women just to say you have women. Maybe a woman who is a world class athlete could almost hang with a guy who was just a random marine, but Serena probably isn't applying for secret service, even if that's true.
Maybe the SS isn't such a job, but maybe it is. IDK. But there definitely are cases like this, such as firemen.
I think it's true that there usually isn't a best candidate. Even if there were, it would be really hard to know which was best. Think of the NFL. A guy's job is to run a pattern and catch a ball. They have detailed video of him doing this highly finite job for 3 years. They test him in any way they want. There's are experts who makes 7 figures to pick the best player and they are wrong all the time.
How do you know they are wrong? And why isn't whatever metric you are using to say they are wrong used to pick them in the first place?
The question was "why is it insane to call someone who is a registered republican a republican?" Given that you've now failed to answer (or even address) it in 2 attempts, I'm going to go ahead and assume it's not "insane", unless you think "insane" means "could possibly be inaccurate, too early to tell".
Well if you were following along and not just going for an easy gotcha you would know I was calling him insane for spamming 3 threads when that news first came out like it for sure makes him a confirmed current republican. The logical thing to do was to wait for more info to come out and some has .Lets do a thought exercise of what we currently know about his political alignment and apply points
shoots leader of the republican party.
This is a pretty big one im going to give it the max -10 points for him being a republican seems like shooting the republican leader will hurt your chances of being a republican
signs some documents to be a registered republican at age 17
Ill give this a +5 This does suggest he viewed himself as a republican 3 years ago. However he was 17 his brain is barely developed and he is at the age where he is really susceptible to new ideas and could have been influenced to join if given a reward.
Donates to dems on the day biden is inaugurated
Ill give this a -3 Its not as strong as saying your a republican party but the fact he donates on the special day biden is sworn is means something
See with the little info we have I still see him being weighted to not very republican even with him being a registered republican. also the info that suggests republican is the oldest of the 3
Again you ignored the legit questions I asked you since im not American I was asking you what it means to be a registered republican because you could change my mind about its importance . What's the process of staying a registered republican? is there a monthly fee? I think in most county's if your a member of a political party you donate a monthly fee. but if that's true in America why has this not been brought up. If this is not true in America is it not possible he simply joined at 17 and forgot about it never to caredagain? Because all signs point to him be apolitical
